“…Artificial construction is difficult for both top-down (such as lithography or etching) , and bottom-up methods ( e.g. , self-assembly). , The self-assembly of block polymers (BCPs) represents one of the few effective strategies. − Compared to their small molecule counterparts, ,− BCP assemblies are structurally more robust, and their periodicity and pore sizes are typically one order of magnitude higher. − Therefore, stable BCP assemblies of bicontinuous structures afford desirable soft templates for developing porous materials, − particularly meso- or macroporous materials providing that the dimensions of synthetic polymer chains are more easily controlled in the range. − However, due to the narrow phase area of bicontinuous structures in the morphological phase diagram of BCP self-assembly and the difficulties in finding the appropriate packing parameters, only limited studies report the BCP self-assembly guided fabrication of bicontinuous porous materials. , Among these, the materials of double networks are dominant, as bicontinuous phases of BCPs typically internalize two identical networks due to the thermodynamic preference. , In contrast, the few successful cases of single networks are mainly limited to inorganic materials, including SiO 2 , metals (Au, Pt, and Ni), − metal oxides (TiO 2 , Nb 2 O 5 , and CsTaWO 6 ), ,, carbon, and metal–phenolic networks (MPNs) . The synthesis, consisting of the replication of the BCP templates prepared by the evaporation-induced solvent (EISA) method or self-assembly in bulk, mainly led to SG topology. − For example, Ho and coworkers reported the preparation of a DG-structured BCP template through the self-assembly of linear triblock terpolymer polyisoprene- b -polystyrene- b -poly( d -lactide) (PI- b -PS- b -PDLA), or PI- b -PS- b -poly( l -lactide) (PI- b -PS- b -PLLA) in bulk followed by the selective removal of th...…”