2020
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i24.3421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress in pulsed electric field ablation for liver cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical applications of IRE are growing, especially for the treatment of liver and pancreatic cancers, and show that IRE represents a safe therapeutic approach, and that the application of this technique may improve patient survival and quality of life [40][41][42][43][44]. Furthermore, applications in the therapy of other tumors are reported.…”
Section: Electroporation-based Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical applications of IRE are growing, especially for the treatment of liver and pancreatic cancers, and show that IRE represents a safe therapeutic approach, and that the application of this technique may improve patient survival and quality of life [40][41][42][43][44]. Furthermore, applications in the therapy of other tumors are reported.…”
Section: Electroporation-based Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If local application in a target tissue is combined with systemic or the local administration of a drug with a low capacity for permeation through the cell membrane, this capacity is locally improved. Thus, the drug can come inside the cell and can explain its therapeutic effect, especially where an electric field is applied [43]. The result is drug targeting.…”
Section: Electroporation-based Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IRE has been generally used in HCC cases where thermal ablation was considered unsuitable or at high risk of complications including the setting of bridge to transplantation [ 178 , 179 , 180 ]. Regarding efficacy, a recent review of nine major studies focused on IRE in the treatment of liver cancers (the majority being HCC) reported a primary efficacy rate of 66–100%, a local recurrence rate of 5–34%, and general and major complication rates of 11–42% and 3–11%, respectively [ 181 ].…”
Section: Ablation Techniques Under Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As opposed to thermal ablative techniques, IRE induces cell death via the delivery of high-voltage short electrical pulses (EPs) and possesses several advantages as a non-thermal ablation technique: a) less collateral thermal damage, especially for vital nerves, vessels, and cavity structures; b) no heat sink effect, avoiding incomplete ablation due to the energy reduction caused by blood flow; and c) preservation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold, promoting rapid postoperative recovery (10,11). Currently, IRE is performed mostly for solid tumors such as liver cancer (12), pancreatic cancer (13), and prostate cancer (8) and provides an advantageous palliative treatment for advanced tumors in the vicinity of important ductal structures, such as large blood vessels, the intestines, bile ducts, or the urinary tract. However, the uneven distribution of the PEF, resulting from the heterogeneous electrical properties of tumor tissue (14,15), leads to incomplete ablation and increases the risk of tumor recurrence, which limits the popularity of IRE in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%