See related article, pp 859 -866 R ecent years have seen considerable advances in the identification of biomarkers related to the development of preeclampsia. [1][2][3][4] Elegant translational studies reported by Maynard et al 3 and Venkatesha et al 4 from the Karumanchi laboratory clearly demonstrated that the antiangiogenic factors soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1; a vascular endothelial growth factor antagonist) and soluble endoglin (a transforming growth factor- antagonist) play important roles in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. In the following years, additional progress has been made with respect to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the role of antiangiogenic factors in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. [2][3][4][5][6] Viewed in concert, these studies have clearly established the importance of angiogenic balance in the maintenance of cardiovascular function in normal pregnancy.Despite marked progress toward these ends, the translation of these findings into clinically useful paradigms has moved at a much slower pace. In lieu of the development of novel treatments for preeclampsia, much current attention has been paid to determining the usefulness of these biomarkers for identification of patients who will go on to develop preeclampsia. Indeed, this is an important endeavor for several reasons, not the least of which is that early identification of preeclamptic patients is a high yield objective for enhancing the management and treatment of this devastating disorder. Moreover, the use of angiogenic markers may be helpful in discriminating patients with preeclampsia from those with other types of gestational hypertension. The study by Ohkuchi et al 7 in the present issue of Hypertension represents another step in the quest to develop highly specific procedures to identify the "preeclamptic profile" as early as possible and identify patients who will go on to develop preeclampsia.Recent studies have taken multiple approaches toward identifying robust methods for determining subsequent onset of preeclampsia. In addition to the more traditional tactics used by earlier studies that evaluated specific markers (sFlt-1, placental growth factor [PlGF], etc) and maternal characteristics (endothelial dysfunction and patient history) associated with preeclampsia, 8,9 several recent studies have used cutting edge metabolomic and proteomic techniques to evaluate circulating and urinary biomarkers that are associated with the preeclamptic syndrome. 10,11 Although there has been interest and effort focused on biomarkers that might predict the development of preeclampsia, identification of the most specific factor(s) that presage the onset of preeclampsia has remained elusive. To that end, the study by Ohkuchi et al 7 brings forth an alternate approach by identifying plasma concentration thresholds of biomarkers such as sFlt-1, PlGF, and soluble endoglin that have come to be synonymous with preeclampsia in recent years. [1][2][3][4] In contrast to determining odds ratios for the development ...