2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent research challenges in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
8

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
1
60
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The pollution removal efficiency of CWs for wastewater treatment relies on microbial-mediated processes, such as the transformation and mineralization of organic matter and/or the degradation of pollutants [34]. Studies suggested that CWs were able to remove organics, total carbon, and nutrients effectively (e.g., fecal indicator bacteria removal ranged from 97% to 99%, such as coliforms and Escherichia coli) [35] but also biological contaminants, metals, or emergent pollutants by more than 85% [36]. In these processes, pollutant removal is reached through a combination of physical, chemical, and biological dynamics and efficiency indicators in which all the elements of CWs (plants, microorganisms, and substrates) can have a significant influence [37], including a positive effect on greenhouse gas emissions reduction [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pollution removal efficiency of CWs for wastewater treatment relies on microbial-mediated processes, such as the transformation and mineralization of organic matter and/or the degradation of pollutants [34]. Studies suggested that CWs were able to remove organics, total carbon, and nutrients effectively (e.g., fecal indicator bacteria removal ranged from 97% to 99%, such as coliforms and Escherichia coli) [35] but also biological contaminants, metals, or emergent pollutants by more than 85% [36]. In these processes, pollutant removal is reached through a combination of physical, chemical, and biological dynamics and efficiency indicators in which all the elements of CWs (plants, microorganisms, and substrates) can have a significant influence [37], including a positive effect on greenhouse gas emissions reduction [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Table 1 shows, treatment areas for CW varied greatly, mainly due to differences in implementation scale (full real scale, pilot plants, lab scale). The reported depths of CW were the usual ones, around 1 m for VSSF, around 0.6 m for HSSF and shallow depths for PL (Torrens et al, 2020;Vymazal et al, 2021). The plants used were the most common ones for CW: Phragmites, Typha, Cyperus (Vymazal, 2013), except for some specific native plants and Geranium.…”
Section: Design and Operational Featuresmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Unfortunately, the technology has not spread significantly in Africa, where there is great potential for this technology. At the beginning of the 21st century, research on the wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands focused on the various design and operation aspects that can lead to the enhanced removal of pollutants [122,123]:…”
Section: Constructed Wetlands For Wastewater Treatment In the 21st Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%