2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4897-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Trends in Lorentzian Geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we have to take care to avoid ill-defined expressions such as C ↓ * ( 5 ∇ A h B ), which is accomplished by appropriate algebraic decomposition of 5 ∇ A h B . Next, to obtain (20) we have used (4) while the final step which leads to (23) uses the behaviour of the 4D covariant derivative under conformal rescalings of the metric, 5 (h)…”
Section: The Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, we have to take care to avoid ill-defined expressions such as C ↓ * ( 5 ∇ A h B ), which is accomplished by appropriate algebraic decomposition of 5 ∇ A h B . Next, to obtain (20) we have used (4) while the final step which leads to (23) uses the behaviour of the 4D covariant derivative under conformal rescalings of the metric, 5 (h)…”
Section: The Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Area inequalities bound the area A of stable MOTS in terms of quantities defined on the MOTS, namely charges and, in the axially symmetric case, angular momenta ( [22,23]). Here we first briefly recall the area inequalities for Einstein-Maxwell and EMD in 4D, and in a 5D vacuum.…”
Section: Area Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation