1995
DOI: 10.1002/anie.199512961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Trends in Photoaffinity Labeling

Abstract: Investigation of receptor-ligand interactions remains an inexhaustible challenge for chemists and biologists. Structural exploration of biological receptors is the starting point for a better understanding of how they function. Photoaffinity labeling is a biochemical approach to identify and characterize receptors targeting further structural investigations. The primary structure of a receptor protein was typically obtained by reverse genetics after exhaustive purification and sequencing of the N-terminal pept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
254
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 402 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
3
254
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fitting the experimental points to a single hyperbola yielded K d ϭ 1.26 M. This indicates that sordarin binds to EF-2 in a specific manner to a defined binding site within the EF-2 molecule and hence supports performing photoaffinity labeling with EF-2 alone. This affinity, similar to that described for rat liver EF-2 and its natural substrate GTP (K d ϭ 3.0 M) (24), seems to be high enough to reduce the risk of nonspecific labeling (25,26). On the other hand, the presence of ribosomes unveils two classes of binding sites with higher affinity, as deduced from the Scatchard plot (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Fitting the experimental points to a single hyperbola yielded K d ϭ 1.26 M. This indicates that sordarin binds to EF-2 in a specific manner to a defined binding site within the EF-2 molecule and hence supports performing photoaffinity labeling with EF-2 alone. This affinity, similar to that described for rat liver EF-2 and its natural substrate GTP (K d ϭ 3.0 M) (24), seems to be high enough to reduce the risk of nonspecific labeling (25,26). On the other hand, the presence of ribosomes unveils two classes of binding sites with higher affinity, as deduced from the Scatchard plot (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Although photoaffinity labeling is a powerful tool to identify amino acids contributing directly to drug binding sites in proteins, results can be biased because the photoreactive intermediate may react preferentially with only certain amino acid side chains, and there is also the possibility that highly reactive side chains distant from the binding site may be labeled (10,11).…”
Section: Photoaffinity Labeling With [mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photoaffinity labeling, which allows the identification of residues in proximity to drug binding sites (10,11), has been used to identify two GABA A R amino acids covalently modified by the etomidate analog [ 3 H]azietomidate (12): ␣1Met-236 within ␣M1 and ␤Met-286 within ␤M3. Photolabeling of these residues was inhibited equally by nonradioactive etomidate and enhanced proportionately by GABA present in the assay, consistent with the presence of these two residues in a common drug binding pocket that would be located at the interface between the ␤ and ␣ subunits in the transmembrane domain (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photoaffinity labeling provides an alternative means to identify amino acids contributing to a drug binding site (18,19) and has been used to determine the orientation of drugs bound in the ABS of Torpedo nAChR (20). Epibatidine binds with very high affinity (ϳ10 pM) to heteromeric neuronal nAChRs (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%