2017
DOI: 10.1515/revce-2016-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent trends in removal and recovery of heavy metals from wastewater by electrochemical technologies

Abstract: Heavy metal-laden water and wastewater pose a threat to biodiversity, including human health. Contaminated wastewater can be treated with several separation and purification methods. Among them, electrochemical treatment is a notable clean technology, versatile and environmentally compatible for the removal and recovery of inorganic pollutants from water and wastewater. Electrochemical technology provides solution for the recovery of metals in their most valuable state. This paper analyses the most recent elec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 186 publications
0
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…When the competitive deposition was further carried out in the presence of silver, copper, and lead, the removal efficiency of lead (>80%) was much higher than the removal efficiency of copper (<20%), which was contrary to expectations based solely on reduction potentials ( Paul Chen and Lim, 2005 ). This result indicates that standard reduction potentials alone do not determine the composition of the deposit; other factors, such as metal concentration, pH, ionic strength, additives, the kind of substrate, chelating agents, mode of electrodeposition (chronoamperometry or chronopotentiometry), applied current signal, temperature, and fluid-dynamic conditions, all work together to determine the characteristics of deposition ( Banthia et al., 2017 ; Ibañez and Fatás, 2005 ; Kim et al., 2018a ; Maarof et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Electrochemical Separations For Selective Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the competitive deposition was further carried out in the presence of silver, copper, and lead, the removal efficiency of lead (>80%) was much higher than the removal efficiency of copper (<20%), which was contrary to expectations based solely on reduction potentials ( Paul Chen and Lim, 2005 ). This result indicates that standard reduction potentials alone do not determine the composition of the deposit; other factors, such as metal concentration, pH, ionic strength, additives, the kind of substrate, chelating agents, mode of electrodeposition (chronoamperometry or chronopotentiometry), applied current signal, temperature, and fluid-dynamic conditions, all work together to determine the characteristics of deposition ( Banthia et al., 2017 ; Ibañez and Fatás, 2005 ; Kim et al., 2018a ; Maarof et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Electrochemical Separations For Selective Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, the selective electrochemical separation and extraction of copper in leachate can be realized by electrochemical metallurgy in theory. Researchers taking copper, nickel and other heavy metals as research objects and their sulfate solutions as simulated wastewater, systematically studied the effects of various factors in electrolysis on the current efficiency and recovery rate of metal deposition [ 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Natural Polymers and Conductive Fillersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] Together with an acidic pH (below 2) and elevated temperatures, such solutions create an aggressive environment that requires exceptionally resistant materials. [19,20] Furthermore, during the EDRR process, the applied potential switches between cathodic and open circuit values, which makes the cathode more vulnerable for corrosion compared to traditional electrowinning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%