“…Furthermore, the progress in nanotechnology has facilitated the development of SERS active nanoprobes that can specifically bind to target microorganisms utilizing recognition elements like antibodies or aptamers. ,− These nanoprobes can generate SERS signals proportional to the concentration of microorganisms. Moreover, the integration of SERS with microfluidic devices has been explored. , The microfluidic platform enables precise control over sample processing and delivery, minimizing sample contamination and reducing the impact on SERS intensity, thereby achieving more precise and repeatable microbial quantitative detection. − However, these methods still primarily rely on the SERS intensity as the main determinant. Furthermore, one strategy involves dispersing microbial particles on the substrate and scanning the dispersed area of the sample point by point using SERS mapping technology to count the microorganisms based on characteristic signals. , However, the absence of discretization and physical isolation of microbial samples, along with the variations in size, clustering, random distribution, and other challenges associated with microorganisms, can result in missed or repeated scanning counts, ultimately leading to inaccuracies in the quantitation results.…”