2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recently Evolved Enhancers Emerge with High Interindividual Variability and Less Frequently Associate with Disease

Abstract: Highlights d Enhancer annotation in marmoset tissues for disease model suitability analysis d Newly evolved enhancers are highly variable between individuals d New enhancers are poorly integrated in the transcriptional machinery d Disease-associated enhancers are more often conserved in marmoset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though disease-related variants seem to be preferentially associated with evolutionarily conserved enhancers [ 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 ], species-specific differences across TF binding patterns [ 341 ] and enhancers divergence do occur [ 342 , 343 , 344 ]. Furthermore, enhancers dispensability despite conservation [ 219 , 345 , 346 ] or functional repurposing [ 347 ], may partially explain the failures of a given TF to recapitulate the regenerative response upon injury observed in other species.…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though disease-related variants seem to be preferentially associated with evolutionarily conserved enhancers [ 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 ], species-specific differences across TF binding patterns [ 341 ] and enhancers divergence do occur [ 342 , 343 , 344 ]. Furthermore, enhancers dispensability despite conservation [ 219 , 345 , 346 ] or functional repurposing [ 347 ], may partially explain the failures of a given TF to recapitulate the regenerative response upon injury observed in other species.…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in a selected group of primates-mostly chimpanzees and macaques-changes in histone mark enrichments are associated with gene expression differences [15][16][17][18] . Several studies have also targeted the appearance of human-specific methylation [19][20][21][22][23] patterns and active promoters and enhancers in different anatomical structures and cell types [11][12][13][14][15] . All these studies have proven that comparative epigenomics is a powerful tool to investigate the evolution of RE 24,25 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the meaning and relevance of this observation seems unclear. While genome-wide studies discussed above present interesting observations on a link between evolution of human regulome and SCZ and ADSs, it is also important to stress that the species-specific, recently evolved enhancers are variable between individuals and tend to have minor impact on gene expression ( Castelijns et al, 2020 ). Altogether these observations reinforce the need for extensive functional validation of the human specific and disease associated regulatory variants in the human genome.…”
Section: Human Accelerated Cis -Regulatory Element...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to achieve an in-depth understanding of the contribution of non-coding sequences to NDs (and any other diseases for that matter) it will be essential to improve assemblies and annotations of the NHP genomes ( Nurk et al, 2022 ; Vollger et al, 2022 ). Likewise, it will be beneficial to include a larger cohort of human and NHP genomes in the analysis ( Castelijns et al, 2020 ), and improve protocols of in-vitro and in-vivo systems to assess the contribution of genetic variants in distinct cell types present in the human brain.…”
Section: Summary—perspectives and Future Avenues For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%