2016
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recentralization as an Alternative to Urban Dispersion: Transformative Planning in a Neoliberal Societal Context

Abstract: Growing dissatisfaction with the prevailing dispersed urban form and its generalized reliance on the automobile has resulted in the formulation of planning models seeking to substitute dispersed development with recentralization. A survey of 301 planning documents with a metropolitan focus, originating from the 58 US and Canadian urban regions with a population exceeding one million, reveals widespread support for urban recentralization. But interviews with 55 planners, involved in the preparation of these pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transformations of the suburb are also promoted by planning initiatives, inspired by smart growth and sustainable development, attempting to intensify the suburban realm and make it more walkingand public-transit conducive (Burchell, Downs, McCann, & Mukherji, 2005;Calthorpe & Fulton, 2001;Flint, 2006). A major theme present across North American metropolitan-scale plans is the recentralization of suburbs through the creation of hierarchies of multifunctional centres, from large centres, targeting as their catchment areas entire quadrants of metropolitan regions, to neighbourhood-scale centres of complete communities (Filion, Kramer, & Sands, 2016). There are, however, many obstacles in the way of planning attempts at modifying suburban land use-transportation dynamics.…”
Section: The Durability Of the Suburban Land Use-transportation Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformations of the suburb are also promoted by planning initiatives, inspired by smart growth and sustainable development, attempting to intensify the suburban realm and make it more walkingand public-transit conducive (Burchell, Downs, McCann, & Mukherji, 2005;Calthorpe & Fulton, 2001;Flint, 2006). A major theme present across North American metropolitan-scale plans is the recentralization of suburbs through the creation of hierarchies of multifunctional centres, from large centres, targeting as their catchment areas entire quadrants of metropolitan regions, to neighbourhood-scale centres of complete communities (Filion, Kramer, & Sands, 2016). There are, however, many obstacles in the way of planning attempts at modifying suburban land use-transportation dynamics.…”
Section: The Durability Of the Suburban Land Use-transportation Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such centres can be developed at different scales, depending on the size of their catchment areas: the neighbourhood, the municipality or a quadrant of the metropolitan region (Filion, Kramer & Sands, 2016).…”
Section: Post-suburbanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grant () noted that market constraints (including developer and consumer preferences), political commitment, and pressure for private‐sector solutions limited the implementation of new planning principles in Canadian cities. Filion et al () explained that neoliberal philosophies, consumer attachment to car‐dependent lifestyles, prevailing transportation and land‐use patterns, and limited regional planning capacity undermine the potential for transformation in North America. Challenges may be especially daunting for mid‐sized cities that wish to change practices: they tend to have more dispersed form already (Bunting et al ), are growing relatively slowly (Simmons and Bourne ), and have few resources to invest in systems such as mass transit (Filion ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%