2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receptance-based robust stability criteria for second-order linear systems with time-varying delay and unstructured uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eigenvalues are not positive and follow the Lyapunov stability criterion. 22 Therefore, when the time tends to infinity, the brake clearance is close to the equilibrium point. The controllability matrix signal G O defined as…”
Section: System Dynamic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eigenvalues are not positive and follow the Lyapunov stability criterion. 22 Therefore, when the time tends to infinity, the brake clearance is close to the equilibrium point. The controllability matrix signal G O defined as…”
Section: System Dynamic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed PIDA controller is defined by a linear time-invariant control law. Hence, standard tools for robustness analysis with respect to unstructured uncertainties and delays can be applied a posteriori (Franklin et al, 2021). Moreover, due to the generality of the polytopic description, polytopic difference inclusions can be used to formally represent time-varying delay effect (Gielen et al, 2010) and some types of nonlinearities (Boyd et al, 1994; Hu et al, 2006) a priori.…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the relevance of modeling error, some studies on the robustness analysis and design of the controlled system have been delivered in recent times. The robust control of vibrating systems using FEM or receptance models can be addressed by different approaches (Abdelaziz, 2013; Adamson et al, 2020; Franklin et al, 2021). The partial eigenstructure assignment with guaranteed robustness is described in early and more recent works as Cai et al (2010); Araújo et al (2018); Xie (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A search strategy based on the maximum peak of the sensitivity function (M s ) associated with this loop-gain can offer a trade-off between robustness and performance for the closed-loop controlled system [29]. As the system parameters are usually uncertain, robustness is a significant issue in the controller design [32]. The peak M s is related with a disk with center in the critical abscissa of instability (−1, 0) and radius equal to M −1 s .…”
Section: Introduction Of the Robustness Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%