2020
DOI: 10.1017/langcog.2020.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receptive number morphosyntax in children with Down syndrome

Abstract: This study investigated the comprehension of plural morphosyntactic markers and its relationship with numerical comparison abilities in children with Down syndrome (DS). It evaluated 16 Spanish-speaking children with DS (mean verbal mental age = 3;6) and 16 typically developing children with similar receptive vocabulary (mean chronological age = 3;5). Children participated in two preferential looking tasks assessing their abilities to map singular and plural markers to their visual referents and to distinguish… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is unclear whether participants with DS may encounter difficulty using word-learning mechanisms that require greater cognitive demands that tap into other domains, such as phonology or morphology. For example, people with DS experience particular challenges producing morphemes (Galeote et al, 2014), but the comprehension of some morphemes is preserved (Abreu-Mendoza et al, 2020). Future studies should investigate whether children with DS, despite their impairments in production and working memory, employ morphological information to bootstrap the meaning of new words, as do children with TD (Jolly & Plunkett, 2008).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is unclear whether participants with DS may encounter difficulty using word-learning mechanisms that require greater cognitive demands that tap into other domains, such as phonology or morphology. For example, people with DS experience particular challenges producing morphemes (Galeote et al, 2014), but the comprehension of some morphemes is preserved (Abreu-Mendoza et al, 2020). Future studies should investigate whether children with DS, despite their impairments in production and working memory, employ morphological information to bootstrap the meaning of new words, as do children with TD (Jolly & Plunkett, 2008).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%