1991
DOI: 10.2337/diab.40.11.1488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receptor Binding and Tyrosine Kinase Activation by Insulin Analogues With Extreme Affinities Studied in Human Hepatoma HepG2 Cells

Abstract: The insulin-receptor affinity of five human insulin analogues with one to four amino acid substitutions was measured with human hepatoma cells (HepG2). The binding affinities ranged from 0.05% for AspB25 insulin, 18% for AspB9, GluB27 insulin, 80% for AspB28 insulin, and 327% for AspB10 insulin to 687% for HisA8, HisB4, GluB10, HisB27 insulin relative to human insulin. Binding constants obtained by competition experiments at steady state with [125I]TyrA14-labeled insulin and unlabeled analogues and by kinetic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the majority of studies the binding affinity of insulin X10 to IR has been found to be increased 200-400% relative to that of human insulin. It was also noted by these early studies that the binding affinity of insulin X10 to IGF-1R was increased compared with that of human insulin [17,18] but with a fairly low affinity compared with IGF-1 itself, an effect that has subsequently been confirmed by a number of authors [19][20][21][22]. In addition to the increased receptor affinities, [12] insulin X10 was shown to have an increased in vitro ability to stimulate cell growth and DNA synthesis, and Bornfeldt and colleagues speculated that this was due to a substitution in the insulin X10 molecule that made this analogue more chemically similar to the IGF-1 molecule [18].…”
Section: Understanding Insulin X10mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the majority of studies the binding affinity of insulin X10 to IR has been found to be increased 200-400% relative to that of human insulin. It was also noted by these early studies that the binding affinity of insulin X10 to IGF-1R was increased compared with that of human insulin [17,18] but with a fairly low affinity compared with IGF-1 itself, an effect that has subsequently been confirmed by a number of authors [19][20][21][22]. In addition to the increased receptor affinities, [12] insulin X10 was shown to have an increased in vitro ability to stimulate cell growth and DNA synthesis, and Bornfeldt and colleagues speculated that this was due to a substitution in the insulin X10 molecule that made this analogue more chemically similar to the IGF-1 molecule [18].…”
Section: Understanding Insulin X10mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One of the first molecular characteristics that was observed to differ between insulin X10 and human insulin was increased binding to IR itself [11,17]. In the majority of studies the binding affinity of insulin X10 to IR has been found to be increased 200-400% relative to that of human insulin.…”
Section: Understanding Insulin X10mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[125I]GLP-1 (7-36)amide was prepared by iodinating the peptide with ~25I using HzO2/lactoperoxidase at neutral pH and purified by reverse-phase HPLC as described elsewhere [7], resulting in a specific activity of 1.76/.tCi/pmol. All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemicals (St. Loius, MO, USA).…”
Section: Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A biosimilar insulin should then bind to, and dissociate from, the two main types of insulin receptor, and the insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1) receptor, to the same measurable extent as the original insulin. The dissociation rate is thought to be important because the post‐receptor signalling pathways of insulin include metabolic and growth promotional pathways, and a historical rapid‐acting insulin analogue (B10‐Asp‐human‐insulin) is believed to have manifested its tumorigenic activity as a result of slow dissociation from its receptor 13. Assessment of both receptor binding and post‐receptor activity is further complicated because a range of tissues and cell lines have been used for preclinical studies with different insulins, often with limited clarity as to their pathophysiological relevance.…”
Section: Preclinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%