2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01014-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receptor constants for endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-1-ol indicate differences in efficacy and receptor occupancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the test compound has less pronounced gastrointestinal side effects, though we did not expect it, since it showed high efficacy in in vitro assays, implying that it behaves as a full agonist. It is noteworthy that similar promising favorable profile had also been reported by Holtman and coworkers for morphine-6-Osulfate (Holtman et al, 2010), but in its case the partial agonistic property might explain the mild gastrointestinal inhibitory action (Lackó et al, 2012;Al-Khrasani et al, 2001). Morphine, on the other hand, is also a partial agonist, but induced more pronounced antitransit effect than the other two derivatives.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest that the test compound has less pronounced gastrointestinal side effects, though we did not expect it, since it showed high efficacy in in vitro assays, implying that it behaves as a full agonist. It is noteworthy that similar promising favorable profile had also been reported by Holtman and coworkers for morphine-6-Osulfate (Holtman et al, 2010), but in its case the partial agonistic property might explain the mild gastrointestinal inhibitory action (Lackó et al, 2012;Al-Khrasani et al, 2001). Morphine, on the other hand, is also a partial agonist, but induced more pronounced antitransit effect than the other two derivatives.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Our findings indicate that 14-O-methylmorphine similar to DAMGO but not to morphine produced high efficacy. The full and partial agonist character of an opioid agonist is an important issue, since many reports described that a decrease in antinociceptive efficacy of currently used opioid is a consequence of decrease in opioid receptor reserve (Al-Khrasani et al, 2001, 2007Khalefa et al, 2013;Riba et al, 2010). Therefore, only opioid of high efficacy (having spare receptors) will be able to produce antinociception by chronic administration without substantial loss of effect.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endomorphins were reported to be partial agonists at MOPr in some cases, such as in GTP␥S binding assays with spinal cord and thalamus (Hosohata et al, 1998;Narita et al, 1998;Sim et al, 1998;Xie et al, 2008) and in inhibition of neuronal Ca 2ϩ currents (Connor et al, 1999), whereas the endomorphins behaved as full agonists in other cases, such as inhibition of contraction of mouse vas deferens (Al-Khrasani et al, 2001;Rónai et al, 2006); such differences are likely to depend in part on the receptor reserve in each tissue. In the present study with LC neurons, we found endomorphin-2 to be a full agonist for activation of GIRK current.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33] In fact, the C-terminal residue is essential for high-affinity binding of EMs to the MOR. [23][24][25][26] Many results have suggested that the bioactivity of this sequence (Tyr-Pro-Trp/Phe-X-NH 2 ) is determined by the nature of the fourth residue, [24] and the third aromatic pharmacophore is crucial for bioactivity. [20,24] For example, in Tyr-W-MIF-1 (Tyr-ProTrp-Gly-NH 2 ), the affinity increases about 200-fold [20] if Gly 4 is substituted by the hydrophobic residue Phe, resulting in an observation that actually led to the discovery of EMs.…”
Section: Solution Conformation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] The C-terminal address fragment Phe 4 -NH 2 plays an important role in ligand recognition. [23][24][25][26] The replacement of Phe 4 by bPhe, [27] l/d-Dmp, [28] aromatic, heteroaromatic, or aliphatic groups [29] considerably decreased affinity and selectivity toward the receptor; however, incorporation of (2S,3S)-bMePhe 4 resulted in analogues with m-opioid affinities fourfold higher than the parent peptides. [17] To get insight into the important role of the third aromatic ring arrangement, we report herein the modification of the C termini of EM analogues ([Xaa 4 -R]EMs) by substitution of the Phe 4 group with nonaromatic residues and by termination with benzyl groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%