Receptor endocytosis orchestrates the spatiotemporal bias of β-arrestin signaling

Abstract

The varying efficacy of biased and balanced agonists is generally explained by the stabilization of different active receptor conformations. In this study, systematic profiling of transducer activation of AT1angiotensin receptor agonists revealed that the extent and kinetics of β-arrestin binding exhibit substantial ligand-dependent differences, which however completely disappear upon the inhibition of receptor internalization. Even weak partial agonists for the β-arrestin pathway acted as full or near full agonists, if receptor endocytosis was prevented, indicating that receptor conformation is not an exclusive determinant of β-arrestin recruitment. The ligand-dependent variance in β-arrestin translocation at endosomes was much larger than it was at the plasma membrane, showing that ligand efficacy in the β-arrestin pathway is spatiotemporally determined. Experimental investigations and mathematical modeling demonstrated how multiple factors concurrently shape the effects of agonists on endosomal receptor–β-arrestin binding and thus determine the extent of bias. Among others, ligand dissociation rate and G protein activity have particularly strong impact on receptor–β-arrestin interaction, and their effects are integrated at endosomes. Our results highlight that endocytosis forms a key spatiotemporal platform for biased GPCR signaling and can aid the development of more efficacious functionally-selective compounds.

Location bias: A “Hidden Variable” in GPCR pharmacology

“…A similar finding was recently demonstrated in a study of spatiotemporal β-arrestin signaling at the AT1R using a variety of biased peptide agonists. [79] They found that these ligands greatly differed in their ability to recruit β-arrestin to the AT1R. However, when the authors inhibited internalization, they observed that nearly all partial agonists behaved liked full agonists (i.e., similar efficacies) (Figure 3D).…”

“…[12] Similar findings were obtained in the study on the AT1R, where the authors found that inhibiting internalization had a significant impact on a ligand's ability to recruit β-arrestin, but did not impact G protein activation. [79] It is plausible that these observations occur due to differential localization and availability of G proteins and β-arrestins in subcellular compartments. Nonetheless, location-specific effects can be pathway-dependent but likely impact other aspects of signaling, including temporal regulation, protein conformation, and other GPCR interacting partners beyond G proteins and β-arrestins.…”