2007
DOI: 10.1017/s1478572207000539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Recercar’ – The Collaborative Process as Invention

Abstract: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following examples by Clarke et al (2005), Fitch and Heyde (2007), and Clarke et al (2013), first-hand insight and knowledge involves participants as researchers in the creative process. Co-authorship with the composer enables more searching questions to be considered and reconsidered through the composer–researcher dialogue than might otherwise have been the case.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following examples by Clarke et al (2005), Fitch and Heyde (2007), and Clarke et al (2013), first-hand insight and knowledge involves participants as researchers in the creative process. Co-authorship with the composer enables more searching questions to be considered and reconsidered through the composer–researcher dialogue than might otherwise have been the case.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such pragmatic approaches may well be beneficial to both parties, but they come at the cost of reinforcing the boundaries inherent in their respective roles. We have felt it worthwhile to present an account of our work, in so far as it represents a more dynamic model of the collaborative process, in order to articulate some of the ways in which creative practice may be understood as research (FITCH;HEYDE, 2007, p. 93).…”
Section: Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This growing attention to the subjective experience of the performer has led musicians to become increasingly involved in the research process, whether as participants or as researchers themselves. A recent but rapidly expanding body of literature seeks to document the creative process from “within,” with performer-researchers investigating their own professional practice (Barrett et al, 2014; Doğantan-Dack, 2012; Fitch & Heyde, 2007; Gyger, 2014; Hayden & Windsor, 2007; Kanga, 2014; Roche, 2011; Roe, 2007). Following investigations into expert pianists’ rehearsal and performance practices led by Roger Chaffin (Chaffin, Imreh, & Crawford, 2002; Chaffin, Imreh, Lemieux, & Chen, 2003), a study by Eric Clarke, Nicholas Cook, Bryn Harrison, and Philip Thomas (2005) was one of the first of its kind to incorporate the perspectives of the composer, performer, and analyst, synthesising qualitative and quantitative methods in order to investigate the preparation and performance of a complexly notated piano work.…”
Section: Musical Performance Studies: a Move To The “Real World”mentioning
confidence: 99%