2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11259-005-0839-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rechallenge of previously-infected pregnant ewes with Chlamydophila abortus

Abstract: In an attempt to ascertain the means whereby previous exposure to Chlamydophila (C.) abortus can protect against the re-occurrence of enzootic abortion of ewes (EAE), ten previously-exposed ewes were intravenously rechallenged with a large infective dose of C. abortus during pregnancy. The patterns of development of chlamydial placentitis and its sequelae closely resembled that observed following first-time challenge of previously-naïve ewes, although placentitis appeared to develop more slowly following recha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, in the present study, 10 ewes (8 vaccinated and 2 control) with different reproductive outcome (2 reproductive failures, 7 normal parturitions and the sheep from group C died during delivery, of which 3 were positive in the PCR) never seroconverted during the study, demonstrating that serological responses do not always correlate with C. abortus previous contact, reproductive failure, or vaccine efficacy, in agreement with previous findings (11, 18, 40, 44, 51, 56, 58). However, negative results in these animals (known to be exposed to C. abortus through vaccination and/or challenge) could also be due to a lack of sensitivity of the ELISA used, based on the detection of antibodies against major outer membrane proteins (MOMPs), considered to be less sensitive than tests based in polymorphic outer membrane proteins (POMPs) (9, 36, 44, 45).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, in the present study, 10 ewes (8 vaccinated and 2 control) with different reproductive outcome (2 reproductive failures, 7 normal parturitions and the sheep from group C died during delivery, of which 3 were positive in the PCR) never seroconverted during the study, demonstrating that serological responses do not always correlate with C. abortus previous contact, reproductive failure, or vaccine efficacy, in agreement with previous findings (11, 18, 40, 44, 51, 56, 58). However, negative results in these animals (known to be exposed to C. abortus through vaccination and/or challenge) could also be due to a lack of sensitivity of the ELISA used, based on the detection of antibodies against major outer membrane proteins (MOMPs), considered to be less sensitive than tests based in polymorphic outer membrane proteins (POMPs) (9, 36, 44, 45).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This finding could be explained at least in part by several factors. First, the moment of the experimental infection during the pregnancy has been demonstrated to impact the ability of the ewe to control it (11, 53, 54); here, the challenge was performed at approximately 85 ± 8 days of pregnancy in contrast with previous reports in which it took place between 60 and 75 days of pregnancy, considered the most susceptible period (2, 7, 42, 44, 46, 55). A challenge performed later during pregnancy could lead to a lower degree of colonization of the placenta and a milder infection and, ultimately, a lower level of excretion (thus being more difficult to detect by PCR) and a lower proportion of abortions (9, 12) as supported by results based on a late (90–105 days post-mating) challenge (4, 23, 39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No fetal antibodies specific for EB were detected at 30 dpi. The failure of the fetuses to respond serologically to C. abortus until day 35 is consistent with the time required for the organism to spread from the infected trophoblast to the fetal tissues and the development of lesions of multifocal necrosis in the major fetal organs (37). The 26-to 32-kDa antigens were clearly detected on 2-D immunoblots with both ewe and fetal sera.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…These haematomatas may allow C. abortus to invade the placenta from maternal blood in persistently-infected ewes. The pathogenesis of OEA has been linked to the ability of the ewe to control the levels of infectious EBs in blood, suggesting that both timing and dose of placental infection are important factors (Sammin et al, 2005;2006). Thus, it may be simply be a case of opportunistic infection of trophoblast by C. abortus when fetal cells come in direct contact with maternal blood.…”
Section: Structure Of the Sheep Placentamentioning
confidence: 99%