2010
DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rechallenging with anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast cancer

Abstract: Adjuvant use of anthracycline-taxane combination therapy is an accepted strategy in the management of high-risk early-stage breast cancer. However, the introduction of this regimen raises the question of how best to manage those patients who relapse following adjuvant therapy, and whether there is a role for rechallenging in the metastatic setting with the same agent, or class of agent, that has been utilized in the adjuvant setting. This Review examines the evidence for rechallenging with both anthracyclines … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
42
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, several epothilones have been developed, which bind a similar site on tubulin but differ from the taxanes in specific binding characteristics, potency, and cross-resistance (28)(29)(30). A number of microtubule-stabilizing drug regimens are under investigation for refractory metastatic disease (31,32). The current report describes a new drug related to the taxanes, TPI-287.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several epothilones have been developed, which bind a similar site on tubulin but differ from the taxanes in specific binding characteristics, potency, and cross-resistance (28)(29)(30). A number of microtubule-stabilizing drug regimens are under investigation for refractory metastatic disease (31,32). The current report describes a new drug related to the taxanes, TPI-287.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite current lack of standard of care, a considerable proportion of these women receives multiple lines of treatment for metastatic disease, including taxane rechallenge, according to previous efficacy and tolerance, with results that justify this practice [Roché and Vahdat, 2011;Planchat et al 2011;Palumbo et al 2013;Cardoso et al 2014]. However, very few data are available outlining outcomes after this pragmatic approach in MBC [Palmieri et al 2010;Toulmonde et al 2012;Andreupoulou and Sparano, 2013]. In clinical practice, the introduction of liposomal anthracyclines offers an opportunity for anthracycline rechallange in MBC, whereas taxane rechallange may be possible by selecting a different taxane, using an alternative regimen of the same agent or selecting paclitaxel albumin [Palmieri et al 2010].…”
Section: Clinical Development Of Nab-paclitaxel In Breast Cancer Patimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, very few data are available outlining outcomes after this pragmatic approach in MBC [Palmieri et al 2010;Toulmonde et al 2012;Andreupoulou and Sparano, 2013]. In clinical practice, the introduction of liposomal anthracyclines offers an opportunity for anthracycline rechallange in MBC, whereas taxane rechallange may be possible by selecting a different taxane, using an alternative regimen of the same agent or selecting paclitaxel albumin [Palmieri et al 2010]. The first suggestion that nab-paclitaxel does not demonstrate absolute cross-resistance with firstgeneration taxanes is derived from a phase II study on 181 MBC patients, whose disease progressed despite conventional taxane therapy.…”
Section: Clinical Development Of Nab-paclitaxel In Breast Cancer Patimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interval period between the last medication of prior 5-FU and S-1 monotherapy might also be one of the reasons for it. Actually, retreatment with anthracyclines and taxanes has been reported to be an effective treatment option in metastatic breast cancer [21]. In this study, 83% (5/6) of patients who had completely responded to prior FP regimen achieved CR/SD by S-1 monotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%