These issues are especially prominent in aqueous electrolytes, as hydrogen evolution reaction readily occurs at such low potentials and water molecules act as an oxygen source for oxide film formation. [4] Remarkably, two recent works have seemingly been able to address these challenges by engineering a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on Al, either "in situ" by 5 m (mol kg −1 ) Al(OTF) 3 (aluminum triflate) water-in-salt electrolyte (Al-WiSE), [5] or "ex situ" by IL pretreatment. [6] These two pioneering studies have since led a surge in reports of fully reversible aqueous AMBs (AAMB). [7][8][9][10][11][12] There are however concerns regarding the validity and effectiveness of the two SEI engineering methods. First, there has not been any experimental or computational characterizations that support an SEI can form on Al from 5 m Al(OTF) 3 , especially given its low concentration compared with alkali metal WiSE. [13,14] The only reason an SEI is believed to exist is by observing a delayed onset of hydrogen evolution reaction on a glassy carbon electrode, which is not a reliable indicator given its high hydrogen evolution reaction overpotentials, particularly relative to Al. [15] On the other hand, while it is proven that IL treatment can form a residue layer on Al, its fundamental ion and electron transport properties as well as its stability in aqueous electrolytes were not investigated; hence, its ability to function as an artificial SEI, is practically unknown. To address these concerns, in this work we critically evaluated each SEI engineering method, elucidated their underlying mechanisms, and revealed whether they can allow for truly rechargeable AAMBs.