Föderale Politikgestaltung Im Deutschen Bundesstaat 2008
DOI: 10.5771/9783845210650-36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rechtliche Grundlagen der Zusammenarbeit zwischen Bund und Ländern im Bereich der Verwaltung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those job centres, at least in their standard form, are joint administrations, uniting under one roof a municipal (following the tradition of the municipal responsibility for paying social care) and a federal administration (following the tradition of the federal responsibility for unemployment benefits). This double-hatted administration runs counter to a basic principle for the distribution of tasks in the German federal system which forbids mixed administrations (Remmert, 2008). Financially, because they assigned costly tasks to the municipal level (costs for the municipal part of the personnel and the organization as well as of costs for the heat and rent benefits), they created a considerable and long-lasting financial burden for the municipalities (more specifically for the counties) without providing for an adequate compensation.…”
Section: 'Hartz Iv'disentanglement In Unemployment Policymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Those job centres, at least in their standard form, are joint administrations, uniting under one roof a municipal (following the tradition of the municipal responsibility for paying social care) and a federal administration (following the tradition of the federal responsibility for unemployment benefits). This double-hatted administration runs counter to a basic principle for the distribution of tasks in the German federal system which forbids mixed administrations (Remmert, 2008). Financially, because they assigned costly tasks to the municipal level (costs for the municipal part of the personnel and the organization as well as of costs for the heat and rent benefits), they created a considerable and long-lasting financial burden for the municipalities (more specifically for the counties) without providing for an adequate compensation.…”
Section: 'Hartz Iv'disentanglement In Unemployment Policymentioning
confidence: 92%