2014
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-201407151-01337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recipient-Matching of Passenger Leukocytes Prolongs Survival of Donor Lung Allografts in Miniature Swine.

Abstract: Background-Allograft rejection continues to be a vexing problem in clinical lung transplantation, and the role played by passenger leukocytes in the rejection or acceptance of an organ is unclear. Here we tested whether recipient-matching of donor graft passenger leukocytes would impact graft survival in a preclinical model of orthotopic left lung transplantation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we could show that splenocytes from a third‐party donor had virtually the same effect as donor‐specific splenocytes. This possible bystander effect of cross‐reactive T cells, indicating shared antigens of lung and splenocyte donors, might also explain the protolerogenic effect of recipient matching of the passenger leukocytes . Importantly, administration of subcellular splenocyte‐derived antigen did not improve allograft survival (Figure B) and might potentially even promote rejection through indirect allorecognition as shown by Allan and his group .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, we could show that splenocytes from a third‐party donor had virtually the same effect as donor‐specific splenocytes. This possible bystander effect of cross‐reactive T cells, indicating shared antigens of lung and splenocyte donors, might also explain the protolerogenic effect of recipient matching of the passenger leukocytes . Importantly, administration of subcellular splenocyte‐derived antigen did not improve allograft survival (Figure B) and might potentially even promote rejection through indirect allorecognition as shown by Allan and his group .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The unique and often divergent roles of different macrophage populations within a given organ is currently a topic of intense study, but the functional consequence of these differences has not been well defined in the context of solid organ transplantation [100]. In swine, when intrapulmonary passenger leukocytes were MHC-matched to recipients, lung allograft survival was significantly higher than in nonmatched controls [101]. In the human and mouse heart, distinct macrophage populations can be identified based on the expression of CCR2.…”
Section: Macrophagesmentioning
confidence: 99%