1989
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/40.2.207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocal Ammonium Transport Into and Out of Plant Roots: Modifications by Plant Nitrogen Status and Elevated Root Ammonium Concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, NH 4 1 suppresses high-affinity K 1 transport (Scherer et al, 1984;Vale et al, 1987Vale et al, , 1988Morgan and Jackson, 1984;Hirsch et al, 1998;Spalding et al, 1999;Santa-Maria et al, 2000;Ashley et al, 2006), while low-affinity K 1 transport is relatively NH 4 1 insensitive and contributes to the relief from NH 4 1 toxicity at high K 1 (Santa-Maria et al, 2000;Britto and Kronzucker, 2002;Kronzucker et al, 2003b). Similarly, variable sensitivities of K 1 transporters to soil Na 1 are critical factors in salinity tolerance (Epstein et al, 1963;Kochian et al, 1985;Tester and Davenport, 2003;Volkov et al, 2004;Kader and Lindberg, 2005).…”
Section: /Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, NH 4 1 suppresses high-affinity K 1 transport (Scherer et al, 1984;Vale et al, 1987Vale et al, , 1988Morgan and Jackson, 1984;Hirsch et al, 1998;Spalding et al, 1999;Santa-Maria et al, 2000;Ashley et al, 2006), while low-affinity K 1 transport is relatively NH 4 1 insensitive and contributes to the relief from NH 4 1 toxicity at high K 1 (Santa-Maria et al, 2000;Britto and Kronzucker, 2002;Kronzucker et al, 2003b). Similarly, variable sensitivities of K 1 transporters to soil Na 1 are critical factors in salinity tolerance (Epstein et al, 1963;Kochian et al, 1985;Tester and Davenport, 2003;Volkov et al, 2004;Kader and Lindberg, 2005).…”
Section: /Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen starvation or nitrogen-limiting conditions lead to a marked increase in the root capacity to take up NO 3 Ϫ or NH 4 ϩ (Lee and Rudge 1986), a response that is mostly due to the stimulation of the HATSmediated influx of the two ions (Morgan and Jackson, 1988;Hole et al, 1990;Lee, 1993;Wang et al, 1993), and is associated in Arabidopsis with a strong increase in the expression of the NO 3 Ϫ and NH 4 ϩ transporter genes AtNrt2.1 and AtAmt1.1 (Gazzarrini et al, 1999;Lejay et al, 1999). This regulation is thought to be due to repression of NO 3 Ϫ and NH 4 ϩ transporters by reduced nitrogen metabolites accumulating in the tissues under satiety conditions (Jackson et al, 1986;Clarkson and Lü ttge, 1991;Lee et al, 1992;Muller and Touraine, 1992).…”
Section: The Atnrt2 Mutant Lacks the Hats Component Under Feedback Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 NH 4 ؉ Generation in Roots Morgan and Jackson (1988a, 1988b, 1989 (Lambers et al, 1982;Cooper and Clarkson, 1989). In spite of this possibility, no measurable net transport of endogenous 14 N from roots to shoots occurred during the 3-d exposure to 15 NH 4 ϩ .…”
Section: Source Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, after a 5-h pretreatment in 15 NH 4 ϩ solution, the subsequent efflux of 15 NH 4 ϩ to the ambient 14 NH 4 ϩ solution was greater than the initial NH 4 ϩ content of the root (Morgan and Jackson, 1989). Thus, appreciable generation of NH 4 ϩ from endogenous organic N sources accompanies concurrent uptake and assimilation of NH 4 ϩ by roots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%