2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocating two-body abrasive wear behavior of DC magnetron sputtered Mo-based coatings on hard-chrome plated AISI 316 stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schematic illustration of the abrasion wear tester [21] Wear tests of TiAlSiN, TiCrAlSiN and HC were performed by a reciprocating wear tester modified from ASTM G133-05 as shown in Fig. 1 [21].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schematic illustration of the abrasion wear tester [21] Wear tests of TiAlSiN, TiCrAlSiN and HC were performed by a reciprocating wear tester modified from ASTM G133-05 as shown in Fig. 1 [21].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schematic illustration of the abrasion wear tester [21] Wear tests of TiAlSiN, TiCrAlSiN and HC were performed by a reciprocating wear tester modified from ASTM G133-05 as shown in Fig. 1 [21]. The wear tests were performed on a 1000 grit silicon carbide (SiC grit#1000: Struers) and applied load at 5 and 10 N. The oscillating frequency was 1.167 Hz (70 rpm).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cavities were believed to be due to the rigid structure boron carbide reinforcement of the composite, which was referred to in many studies as a two-or threecomponent abrasive wear mechanism. 45,[49][50][51] The length of the counter body, which worn the compact 12, was smaller than the compact 10. There were also some remains on the surfaces, but no cavities have formed as seen in Figure 13(c), (f), and (k).…”
Section: Wear Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, molybdenum-based coatings have shown promising characteristics for advanced tribological applications. For example, MoS and Mo–S–N coatings exhibit low friction (<0.1) and superior wear resistance (8.6 × 10 –7 mm 3 /N m) performance in vacuum conditions due to their basally oriented structure; however, they are highly sensitive to oxygen contamination under ambient conditions, resulting in high friction and wear. On the other hand, MoN coatings exhibit improved mechanical properties ranging from 13 to 30 GPa depending on the deposition method and conditions, and show a low friction of ∼0.3 as well as improved wear resistance of 1.36 × 10 –7 mm 3 /N m. , The incorporation of carbon into the MoN system improves the hardness to 28 GPa and significantly reduces the wear rate to 0.59 × 10 –7 mm 3 /N m. Warcholinski et al achieved a maximum hardness of 44 GPa for MoN and 38 GPa for MoCN coatings deposited using the cathodic arc method, with MoCN having the lowest wear rate of 4.7 ± 1.6 × 10 –17 m 3 /N m . Although MoN and MoCN coatings show improved tribological characteristics along with good adhesion to the metallic substrates, excessive formation of surface oxides leads to higher wear. ,, In this regard, nanocomposite coatings of MoN and MoCN with soft metals, which have low shear strength (Cr, Ag, Au, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%