2022
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzac145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocity in Low Back Pain Care and Its Role in Power Dynamics: A Give-and-Take Approach

Abstract: Objective The shift toward patient-centered care in physical therapy fostered a deeper consideration of power-sharing in clinical interactions. Elements of reciprocity may enhance such power considerations between physical therapist and patients, but there has been little investigation into how reciprocity is enacted in physical therapy, its value, and how to improve it if required. This study investigates forms of reciprocity during physical therapist–patient interactions in low back pain (L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This biomedical scripted approach lends itself to paternalistic practice where the physiotherapist holds more power within the encounter, which is known to negatively impact the therapeutic alliance and patients’ engagement with physiotherapy ( Mescouto et al, 2022b ). It positions the clinician as the expert on the patient’s pain experience rather than a partnership of reciprocal and shared exploration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This biomedical scripted approach lends itself to paternalistic practice where the physiotherapist holds more power within the encounter, which is known to negatively impact the therapeutic alliance and patients’ engagement with physiotherapy ( Mescouto et al, 2022b ). It positions the clinician as the expert on the patient’s pain experience rather than a partnership of reciprocal and shared exploration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both data sets were produced as part of a wider project conducted between April 2019 and June 2021. 5,6,24,25 All 45 clinicians from the two study sites were invited to participate in the dialogues. A total of 29 clinicians provided written consent and participated in the dialogues (seven from Site 1 and 22 from Site 2), a response rate of 64.4%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both data sets were produced as part of a wider project conducted between April 2019 and June 2021. 5,6,24,25…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%