2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RECIST 1.1—Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee

Abstract: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) were developed and published in 2000, based on the original World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines first published in 1981. In 2009, revisions were made (RECIST 1.1) incorporating major changes, including a reduction in the number of lesions to be assessed, a new measurement method to classify lymph nodes as pathologic or normal, the clarification of the requirement to confirm a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and new methodologies f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
999
2
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,394 publications
(1,112 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
9
999
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Response evaluation was done using RECIST version 1.1 [20]. After radiotherapy progressive disease was diagnosed only if the tumor progressed outside the radiation field.…”
Section: Response and Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response evaluation was done using RECIST version 1.1 [20]. After radiotherapy progressive disease was diagnosed only if the tumor progressed outside the radiation field.…”
Section: Response and Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the aims of the traditional strategies, the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) was published in February 2000, by an international collaboration including the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), National Cancer Institute of the United States, and the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group, and comprised a set of published rules that define when tumors in cancer patients improve (“respond”), stay the same (“stabilize”), or worsen (“progress”), during treatments. The majority of clinical trials evaluating cancer treatments for an objective response in solid tumors are using RECIST, of which the core criterion is the extent of eradicating the cancer cells and the primary focus [72]. …”
Section: Clinical Issues and Experiences Of Gene Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The current gold standard in the case of solid tumors is the RECIST. 35 RECIST was a guideline devised to standardize monitoring treatment based on imaging. The approach involves manually assessing differences in size of the target lesions on baseline and repeat CT scans (after therapy) to define various standardized categories 3,6 of treatment response.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%