Reclaiming rent, reclaiming the commons

Crabtree, Tim

doi:10.21428/d2eb3cdf.e1065d74

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ninety-seven percent of the poll's respondents supported requiring officers to have good relations with their communities, and there was a similar level of support for punishing officer abuse and firing officers with multiple instances of abuse. 2 Other research has emphasized that police reform should be guided by community input as part of an ongoing conversation about policing to understand and resolve conflicting goals and values. 3 But what is the best way to get such a conversation started?…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Toolkit for Community-Police Dialogue

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. To learn more about RAND, visit www.rand.org. Research IntegrityOur mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/ about/research-integrity. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Toolkit for Community-Police Dialogue

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Schumacher against globalism and ecomodernism: Ecology, subsidiarity and the politics of scale

Quilley

2024

European Journal of Social Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

E. F. Schumacher’s Small is Beautiful is one of the most succinct elaborations of Catholic social teaching (CST) and ‘distributism’ – construed as an alternative to both capitalism and socialism. Extending the logic of Polanyi, both market and state, and their right- and left-wing ideological expressions, are shown to be contending forms of collectivism – in that both aggregate the agency of disembedded ‘billiard ball’ individuals. Schumacher’s socio-economic vision is rooted in Livelihood and is orthogonal to both left and right, creating an opportunity for an alternative to modernity involving patterns of embedded production, consumption and reproduction (family, household and place-bound community). ‘Smallness’ and ‘localness’ speak to forms of embedded social capital that are ‘sticky’, viscous and relational, more ascriptive and less fluid. But for precisely this reason, the political agenda implicit in Schumacher’s vision is not only post-liberal, but explicitly both covenantal and Christian. It requires the ontology of sovereign, self-actualizing individuals to be reconnected and constrained through a transcendent relationality with God. Small is Beautiful is shown to be diametrically opposed to the eco-modernist, gnostic and sometimes even transhumanist worldview of global environmentalism.

show abstract

Reclaiming rent, reclaiming the commons

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

A Toolkit for Community-Police Dialogue

A Toolkit for Community-Police Dialogue

Schumacher against globalism and ecomodernism: Ecology, subsidiarity and the politics of scale

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About