1972
DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v41n08p195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reclamation of salt-affected high boron soils in western Kern County

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common treatment practice is leaching (Leyshon and Jame, 1993), but this presents several limitations: (1) large volumes of water are required (Bingham et al, 1972), restricting its application in arid and semiarid regions; (2) removal is often incomplete, i.e., only the soluble fraction is removed, which leaves the sorbed fraction that can recharge the soil solution later (Peryea et al, 1985); and (3) soils must have good drainage capacity (Nable et al, 1997). In addition, the collection of the boron-enriched leachate is necessary to prevent contamination of adjacent sites (Bañuelos et al, 1993b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common treatment practice is leaching (Leyshon and Jame, 1993), but this presents several limitations: (1) large volumes of water are required (Bingham et al, 1972), restricting its application in arid and semiarid regions; (2) removal is often incomplete, i.e., only the soluble fraction is removed, which leaves the sorbed fraction that can recharge the soil solution later (Peryea et al, 1985); and (3) soils must have good drainage capacity (Nable et al, 1997). In addition, the collection of the boron-enriched leachate is necessary to prevent contamination of adjacent sites (Bañuelos et al, 1993b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the capability of a soil to regenerate B will be a function of the extraction history of the soil and the time scale over which the phenomenon is observed. Because the sites for soil collection for this study were from a field that had been farmed for decades to cotton, much of the upper profile B has likely been leached to deeper depths or has been partially used by the cotton throughout the years following normal cultivation and irrigation practices (Bingham et al, 1972).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bingham et al (1972) and Reeve et al (1955) reported that B removal required three times more water than that required for the removal of total soluble salts. With time, soils whose soluble B contents have been lowered by leaching may regenerate soluble B to toxic levels through desorption of the more strongly sorbed B or redistribution of B from unleached micropores (Peryea et al, 1985;Rhoades et al, 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In actuality, reclamation depends on soil pH and the quantity and affinity of adsorption sites. Griffin and Burau (1974) examined the kinetics of B desorption from soil and observed that the desorption reaction was almost complete after 10 h, although it continued for up to 72 h. The term regeneration has been used to describe the observed increases in soluble B after reclamation in the laboratory (Rhoades et al, 1970;Peryea et al, 1985a,b) and in the field (Bingham et al, 1972). This regeneration was attributed to the weathering of B-containing minerals and to B release from decomposing organic matter (Rhoades et al, 1970).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Reclamation of high-B soils is reported to require about three times as much leaching water as reclamation of saline soils (Reeve et al, 1955;Bingham et al, 1972), indicating a stronger retention mechanism for B than for soluble salts. In actuality, reclamation depends on soil pH and the quantity and affinity of adsorption sites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%