2019
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reclassification of Micrococcus aloeverae and Micrococcus yunnanensis as later heterotypic synonyms of Micrococcus luteus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This genus is commonly retrieved in European caves and the two most frequent species identified were Micrococcus yunnanensis and M. luteus [7,[20][21][22][23]. However, Huang et al [24] proposed M. yunnanensis as later heterotypic synonym of M. luteus, based on the study of the whole-genome sequencing. In fact, both species are phenotypically and genotypically closely related and were differentiated by DNA-DNA hybridization, although for operative purposes were distinguished by their 16S rRNA sequences and the oxidase test, negative for M. yunnanensis and positive for M. luteus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This genus is commonly retrieved in European caves and the two most frequent species identified were Micrococcus yunnanensis and M. luteus [7,[20][21][22][23]. However, Huang et al [24] proposed M. yunnanensis as later heterotypic synonym of M. luteus, based on the study of the whole-genome sequencing. In fact, both species are phenotypically and genotypically closely related and were differentiated by DNA-DNA hybridization, although for operative purposes were distinguished by their 16S rRNA sequences and the oxidase test, negative for M. yunnanensis and positive for M. luteus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, both species are phenotypically and genotypically closely related and were differentiated by DNA-DNA hybridization, although for operative purposes were distinguished by their 16S rRNA sequences and the oxidase test, negative for M. yunnanensis and positive for M. luteus. Huang et al [24], in addition to the reclassification as a single species, further considered M. luteus as oxidase-variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the low DNA–DNA relatedness could occur as a result of high experimental error [35]. Furthermore, such minor phenotypic differences are also noted in previous studies [39–41], that could arise either due to different habitats or intraspecies differences. The genetic markers for osmotic stress, respiration, fatty acids and lipids were similar (Table S7) suggesting that minor phenotypic differences could arise due to their different habitats such as soil and haddock tissue, which may lead to expression of different transcriptional modulators, thus affecting the phenotypes.…”
Section: Full-textmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These three bacterial taxa are known skin commensals providing several beneficial properties for healthy-looking skin, such as the secretion of antimicrobial peptides by S. epidermidis and S. hominis. [23][24][25] M. yunnanensis belongs to the Micrococcus luteus group as both are phenotypically and genotypically closely related [26]. This species is known to be able to withstand high levels of UV radiation and to produce carotenoids providing important antioxidant and antibacterial activities [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%