2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reclassification Rates Are Higher Among African American Men Than Caucasians on Active Surveillance

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the risk of reclassification on serial biopsy for Caucasian and African American (AA) men with very low risk PCa enrolled in a large prospective AS registry. Methods The Johns Hopkins AS registry is a prospective observational study that has enrolled 982 men since 1994. Including only men who met all National Comprehensive Cancer Network VLR criteria (clinical stage ≤T1, Gleason ≤6, PSA <10 ng/ml, PSA density <0.15 ng/ml/cc, positive cores <3, percent cancer per core ≤50), we analyzed a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also focusing on very low- or low-risk patients, Iremashvili et al 15 (Miami), Abern et al 16 (Duke), and our group 17 have shown that among men on active surveillance in 3 separate cohorts, AA men are at higher risk of disease progression. Taken together with our present findings, these studies question the accuracy of current active surveillance entry criteria for AA men and underscore the need to develop race-specific risk stratifications.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Also focusing on very low- or low-risk patients, Iremashvili et al 15 (Miami), Abern et al 16 (Duke), and our group 17 have shown that among men on active surveillance in 3 separate cohorts, AA men are at higher risk of disease progression. Taken together with our present findings, these studies question the accuracy of current active surveillance entry criteria for AA men and underscore the need to develop race-specific risk stratifications.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, data from Johns Hopkins show that AA men with very low risk disease are at significant risk of disease reclassification (upgrading) when on AS, and are more likely to demonstrate adverse pathologic features after prostatectomy. 22, 23 Therefore, a significant percentage of AA men classified as low risk disease may in fact harbor high risk disease and are being undertreated. To add to this, it has been previously reported that compared to White men, AA are monitored less frequently when receiving WW/AS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study included 139 men (67 of whom were African-Americans) with Gleason score ≤6, <33% positive cores, <50% core involvement, and PSA level ≤10 ng/ml evaluated on AS from July 2005 to October 2012. In the Johns Hopkins experience of 654 men (including 39 African-Americans) on AS with clinical stage ≤T1, Gleason score ≤6, PSA level <10 ng/ml, PSA density <0.15 ng/ml/cm 3 , <3 positive cores, and ≤50% cancer per core, African-American men were more than twice as likely to experience upgrading on serial biopsy than white men (36% versus 16%) and African-American race was an independent predictor of biopsy reclassification (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.23-2.65, P = 0.003) 94 . The findings from each of these studies are limited by the sample size, but the consistency of African-American race as a predictor of disease progression is concerning.…”
Section: Treatment Outcome Differences For Localized Cancermentioning
confidence: 96%