2007
DOI: 10.1002/gps.1877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognising depression in residential facilities: an Australian challenge

Abstract: The CSDD (and the GDS-15 in those without severe cognitive impairment) proved useful in identifying residents who were depressed. Survey questions helped draw attention to factors of importance in development or persistence of these depressions, and hence to strategies for intervention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
37
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In RAC environments, where age-related losses are often intensified, depression is particularly prevalent (Davidson et al, 2012;Snowdon & Fleming, 2008). Our results suggest that selfconcept is significantly eroded in elderly RAC residents and that this is linked with poor mental health, such as depression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In RAC environments, where age-related losses are often intensified, depression is particularly prevalent (Davidson et al, 2012;Snowdon & Fleming, 2008). Our results suggest that selfconcept is significantly eroded in elderly RAC residents and that this is linked with poor mental health, such as depression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Test administration takes an average of 5-7 minutes. The GDS-S has a possible score range of 0 to 15 and scores ≥ 5 may indicate depression (Snowdon & Fleming, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La CSDD tiene 19 ítems, con una puntuación total máxima de 38, y un punto de corte de 7/8 para sintomatología depresiva significativa [25][26][27] .…”
Section: Sujetos Y Métodosunclassified
“…Los valores ≥0,60 fueron considerados altos, de 0,40 a0,59 moderados y de 0,20 a 0,39 débiles 28 . Además, la muestra se dividió en grupos por las siguientes variables: sexo, edad (60-85 y 86 y más), nivel educativo (sin estudios o primarios incompletos versus con estudios primarios o más), por estado civil, por número de problemas de salud crónicos (según la mediana: ≤7 y >7) y por el punto de corte de la CSDD (7/8) [25][26][27] . Se analizó si las puntuaciones de las escalas EQ-5D (índice y EVA) y QoL-AD presentaban diferencias significativas en función de los grupos anteriormente descritos mediante tests t de Student.…”
Section: Sujetos Y Métodosunclassified