2012
DOI: 10.2478/v10117-012-0006-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition and assessment of sinkholes as geosites: lessons from the Island of Gozo (Malta)

Abstract: Recognition and assessment of sinkholes as geosites: lessons from the Island of Gozo (Malta) There is a wide literature on sinkhole or doline classification, formation and evolution. However, despite the fact that they are often characterised by spectacular morphological features, sinkholes are not normally described as geological resources which might be valuable for the society and worth of being promoted for their geomorphological importance. A series of sinkholes have been investigated in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
30
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The bottom of these depressions, at present covered by a Posidonia oceanica mat of vegetation, is peppered by rocky blocks, or draped by medium-fine sand appearing as a flat and smooth surface. Considering their regular shape, their dimensions, their fill and the presence of radial fractures, these presumed sinkholes seem to correspond fairly well to those described by Coratza et al (2012), Soldati et al (2013) and Galve et al (2015) in Gozo. Thus, they could share a similar origin and, perhaps, age, but this hypothesis still requires further investigation (Fig.…”
Section: Nw Maltasupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bottom of these depressions, at present covered by a Posidonia oceanica mat of vegetation, is peppered by rocky blocks, or draped by medium-fine sand appearing as a flat and smooth surface. Considering their regular shape, their dimensions, their fill and the presence of radial fractures, these presumed sinkholes seem to correspond fairly well to those described by Coratza et al (2012), Soldati et al (2013) and Galve et al (2015) in Gozo. Thus, they could share a similar origin and, perhaps, age, but this hypothesis still requires further investigation (Fig.…”
Section: Nw Maltasupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The Maltese Islands are marked by karst features of different size, from dolines to palaeosinkholes (especially in Gozo: Coratza et al 2012;Soldati et al 2013;Galve et al 2015), karst limestone pavements (especially on Lower and Upper Coralline Limestone) and pits (Alexander 1988;Pedley et al 2002;Magri 2006). The archipelago is also incised by a fluvial system consisting of several 'widien' (wadis) that are orientated SW-NE and that have formed narrow valleys from the 'hinterland' to the coastline (Alexander 1988;Anderson 1997).…”
Section: Regional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…similarities and differences. This approach benefits from experience acquired by the authors in previous studies carried out in the Maltese Archipelago [16,34,60] for the selection phase, which required an original adaptation to the Mediterranean morpho-climatic context of former criteria for geosites' quantitative assessment. Finally, in order to rank geosites in terms of management and tourism promotion, the method proposed by Feullet and Sourp [57] was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment procedure here applied was developed based on previous works [50,53,57] and benefited from the outputs of its application in the Isand of Gozo [60]. In particular, considering that the study areas are mainly rural, more emphasis was given to ecological and aesthetic values than to cultural ones, which where anyhow taken into account.…”
Section: Quantitative Assessment Of Geositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Reynard et al (2007Reynard et al ( , 2016, there are two groups of values to be attributed to a landform: scientific and added/additional ones (in literature, e.g. Bruschi Coratza et al, 2012, there are more groups of values, but for the purposes of this article we only use one group). The scientific value comprises of criteria such as integrity, rarity, uniqueness, lithological and morphological diversity, palaeogeographical importance or exemplarity (which is the most important issue for geoconservation and geoeducational potential).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%