2015
DOI: 10.1130/g36743.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition and importance of amalgamated sandy meander belts in the continental rock record

Abstract: Meandering fluvial channels and their meander belts are common in modern continental sedimentary basins, yet compose a minor constituent of the reported fluvial rock record. Here we document exhumed amalgamated meander belt deposits from the upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Utah (United States). The size of the amalgamated meander belt (9000 km 2 ) is significantly larger than any documented previously and comparable in size to those from modern sedimentary basins. We describe a representative outcrop of san… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In places, the repeated interbedding of facies F3a and F3b may record multi-storey stacking of bars, consistent with deposition on rapidly migrating bars, possibly in braided rivers M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (Miall, 1996;Hartley et al, 2016). The intervals of homogenous mudstones with sharp tops and bases which are interbedded with sandstones of this FA are interpreted to have been deposited in low-energy abandoned channels, because facies F3c occurs exclusively in the upper part of this upward fining facies succession (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In places, the repeated interbedding of facies F3a and F3b may record multi-storey stacking of bars, consistent with deposition on rapidly migrating bars, possibly in braided rivers M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (Miall, 1996;Hartley et al, 2016). The intervals of homogenous mudstones with sharp tops and bases which are interbedded with sandstones of this FA are interpreted to have been deposited in low-energy abandoned channels, because facies F3c occurs exclusively in the upper part of this upward fining facies succession (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific scopes of this research are: (i) to document different modes of bar accretion; (ii) to evaluate the effects of waning‐flood stages on the development and shaping of fluvial bars; and (iii) to outline the internal geometry and depositional relief of pre‐vegetation fluvial bars. The results of this study provide the basis for a critical comparison between Proterozoic and modern fluvial‐bar morphodynamics, and underscore the importance of detailed sedimentological work to support morphodynamic reconstructions based on bar morphology (Hartley et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) clearly shows the difference in nature between the Beartooth and the Absaroka systems, as the Beartooth channel bodies are dominated by coarse‐grained more amalgamated channel‐body types indicative of ephemeral alluvial fan deposits (DeCelles et al ., ) (Fig. A), whereas the Absaroka channel‐bodies are more characteristic of more perennial amalgamated meander belt deposits (Hartley et al ., ) (Fig. B and C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%