2023
DOI: 10.23919/jsee.2023.000012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition and interfere deceptive behavior based on inverse reinforcement learning and game theory

Abstract: In real-time strategy (RTS) games, the ability of recognizing other players' goals is important for creating artifical intelligence (AI) players. However, most current goal recognition methods do not take the player 's deceptive behavior into account which often occurs in RTS game scenarios, resulting in poor recognition results. In order to solve this problem, this paper proposes goal recognition for deceptive agent, which is an extended goal recognition method applying the deductive reason method (from gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enhanced performance compared to traditional algorithms By abstracting deception features, the general deceptive behavior model is used to design a behavior plan that best matches the deceiver's past behavior data using inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) [54]. Yifei and Lakshminarayanan plan to configure RL agents for MARL control systems to show their efficacy in managing multiloop processes with significant interconnections.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced performance compared to traditional algorithms By abstracting deception features, the general deceptive behavior model is used to design a behavior plan that best matches the deceiver's past behavior data using inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) [54]. Yifei and Lakshminarayanan plan to configure RL agents for MARL control systems to show their efficacy in managing multiloop processes with significant interconnections.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%