1972
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(72)90029-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition and recall in short-term memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is similar to the one suggested for a different paradigm by Bernbach and Kupchak (1972), and it borrows from signal detection theory (Swets, Tanner, & Birdsall, 1961). For ease of exposition, just the case in which the subject noun phrase is the cue and the predicate is the response, the arrangement in this experiment, will be discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is similar to the one suggested for a different paradigm by Bernbach and Kupchak (1972), and it borrows from signal detection theory (Swets, Tanner, & Birdsall, 1961). For ease of exposition, just the case in which the subject noun phrase is the cue and the predicate is the response, the arrangement in this experiment, will be discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the testing context was held constant across the two tests. Bernbach (1967) and Bernbach and Kupchak (1972) have emphasized the importance of maintaining similar test contexts across different test modes. Six subgroups of five Ss each comprising the control group were shown all three passages with no cues presented following the offset of each sentence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is unclear whether the mixture model can be generalized from recall to recognition, because recall and recognition may be supported by different retrieval processes (e.g., remembering vs. knowing; Mandler, 1980;Tulving, 1985; but see Haist, Shimamura, & Squire, 1992;Wixted, 2007) or representations (Smith & Nielsen, 1970). Given the wider applications of recognition than recall in the literature, partially due to the reduced task difficulty in recognition (Bernbach & Kupchak, 1972;Hollingworth, 1913) and the dependence of memory sensitivity on testing procedures (Makovski, Watson, Koutstaal, & Jiang, 2010), it is important to generalize the mixture model of memory from recall to recognition. Second, the mixture model for recall tasks requires participants to continuously estimate or reproduce a feature of the remembered stimuli, limiting this model to stimuli with reproducible features (e.g., color and orientation).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%