1991
DOI: 10.3758/bf03335235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition memory and source monitoring

Abstract: This study demonstrates a manipulation that has opposite effects on old/new recognition and source monitoring. Deep processing of target items improved performance on an old/new recognition test in which subjects were to discriminate between targets and new distractors, but it impaired performance on a source monitoring test in which subjects were to discriminate between targets and distractors that had also been deeply processed during the experimental session. We argue that the relationship between old/new r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although item and source memory can be affected in similar ways by encoding and test manipulations, this is not always the case (Lindsay & Johnson, 1991). If the bias toward reporting "partner" increased with increases in delay, then the decrease in source accuracy that we observed could reflect an increasing tendency to report "partner" when in doubt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Although item and source memory can be affected in similar ways by encoding and test manipulations, this is not always the case (Lindsay & Johnson, 1991). If the bias toward reporting "partner" increased with increases in delay, then the decrease in source accuracy that we observed could reflect an increasing tendency to report "partner" when in doubt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Numerous studies over the past few decades have supported both theories, but more recent conceptualizations are more complex, suggesting that with interference, learners may confuse contexts, improperly inhibit irrelevant information or make implicit choices based on the familiarity of incorrect items (e.g. Lindsay & Johnson 1991; Anderson & Neely 1996; Jacoby et al . 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know that the information that people can use to remember that something occurred is not necessarily the same information they need to identify the source of the information (e.g. Johnson, 1988;Johnson and Raye, 1981;Lindsay and Johnson, 1991). We also know that when judging the future likelihood of remembering an item ± a judgement of learning ± a range of information is used (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%