2019
DOI: 10.1177/1329878x19850224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Recognition of competition’ versus Will to App: rethinking digital engagement in Australian youth sexual health promotion policy and practice

Abstract: Recent Australian research has found that young people (broadly defined as 15–30-year-olds) express a strong preference for seeking out digital sexual health information that is produced by authoritative sources (e.g. government websites), but are more likely to share material that is funny and/or features intimate first-person narratives. This produces a tension for sexual health messaging that aims to flag credibility, but also ‘spreadability’ – and perhaps even ‘relatability’. This tension is not exclusive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Health promotion agencies often seek to develop digital resources to support young people’s sexual health. However, these efforts tend to ignore the multiple ways in which a broader ecosystem of digital media and devices are operating in ways that are preferred by young people [ 61 ]. These include practices such as consensual sexting, peer-to-peer sharing of information in websites, social media and online discussion forums, and YouTube videos as well as news coverage of sexual health issues on alternative youth-oriented news platforms, such as Buzzfeed, Broadly, and Vice [ 61 - 63 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Health promotion agencies often seek to develop digital resources to support young people’s sexual health. However, these efforts tend to ignore the multiple ways in which a broader ecosystem of digital media and devices are operating in ways that are preferred by young people [ 61 ]. These include practices such as consensual sexting, peer-to-peer sharing of information in websites, social media and online discussion forums, and YouTube videos as well as news coverage of sexual health issues on alternative youth-oriented news platforms, such as Buzzfeed, Broadly, and Vice [ 61 - 63 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these efforts tend to ignore the multiple ways in which a broader ecosystem of digital media and devices are operating in ways that are preferred by young people [ 61 ]. These include practices such as consensual sexting, peer-to-peer sharing of information in websites, social media and online discussion forums, and YouTube videos as well as news coverage of sexual health issues on alternative youth-oriented news platforms, such as Buzzfeed, Broadly, and Vice [ 61 - 63 ]. Searching online tends to be the first port of call for young people when they have sexual health concerns [ 64 ] or simply want more information about sex [ 65 - 67 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although patients were recognized as the main recipient of DH services, non-patient individuals were also another significant subcategory that were specified in the eight studies. Healthy individuals, in particular, were discussed significant group in which individuals were users of wellness programs [ 52 ], carers for patients with long-term conditions [ 47 , 51 ], and administrative staff from health care organizations [ 48 , 50 ]. Medical professionals were also considered consumers who are affected by and interact with the DH platforms as part of their professional practice [ 33 38 ].…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research has also shown that health apps and wearable devices can also demand invisible labour from users, while some people consider them to be overly intrusive 13–17. For some intended users, health apps or wearable devices are viewed as irrelevant, as they do not offer the information or support people need, or are viewed as being poorly designed for the specificities of people’s lives 13 18 19. Furthermore, critical analyses of health app and wearable device content and promotional materials have noted the focus on individual agency and responsibility they tend to adopt, as well as their tacit assumptions concerning the embodied capacities, priorities and lifestyles of intended users 20–22…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%