2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of facial expressions of emotion by adults with intellectual disability: Is there evidence for the emotion specificity hypothesis?

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the emotion recognition abilities of adults (n=23) with an intellectual disability (ID) compared with a control group of children (n=23) without ID matched for estimated cognitive ability. The study examined the impact of: task paradigm, stimulus type and preferred processing style (global/local) on accuracy. We found that, after controlling for estimated cognitive ability, the control group performed significantly better than the individuals with ID. This provides some support for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result differs from that found by Scotland et al (2016), to our knowledge the only other study to have explored processing style and emotion recognition in people with an intellectual disability. These authors found that having a local processing style was related to less accurate emotion recognition, but only when the results from all the participants (adults with an intellectual disability and typically developing children matched on estimated cognitive ability) were combined.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result differs from that found by Scotland et al (2016), to our knowledge the only other study to have explored processing style and emotion recognition in people with an intellectual disability. These authors found that having a local processing style was related to less accurate emotion recognition, but only when the results from all the participants (adults with an intellectual disability and typically developing children matched on estimated cognitive ability) were combined.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…As both studies used the same emotion and processing Emotion recognition 8 style tasks, it is unlikely that the differing results are due to factors such as the amount and clarity of information available in the emotion stimuli (Martin et al 2012) or the nature and comparative difficulty of the task (D'Souza et al 2016) across the two studies. The ages of the participants did, however, differ, with the study by Scotland et al (2016) including adults, rather than children with an intellectual disability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Autori ukazuju i na to da intelektualne sposobnosti ne moraju biti u direktnoj vezi sa sposobnošću prepoznavanja emocija (Brosgole et al, 1986; Gioia & Brosgole, 1988, sve prema Rojahn et al, 1995), što se objašnjava navodima da za obradu vizuelno-afektivnih informacija odraslih osoba sa IO nije presudna mentalna starost ispitanika, već postojanje deficita emocionalno-perceptivne prirode, koji su nezavisni od kognitivnog ograničenja, što se u literaturi naziva hipotezom emocionalne specifičnosti (Rojahn et al, 1995). U prilog tome govore i navodi o uticaju lokalnog procesuiranja stimulusa na detekciju emocija kod ovih osoba (Scotland et al, 2016). U kontekstu svega navedenog može se tumačiti i rezultat da ispitanici sa lakom i umerenom IO ostvaruju relativno ujednačena postignuća na zadacima za procenu emocije ljutnje i tuge.…”
Section: Diskusija Sa Zaključnim Razmatranjimaunclassified
“…Overall, these studies show that physical disability can reduce self-esteem [7] and cause mental distress and depression [8]. On the other hand, people with physically disabilities and impairment in the development of motor coordination and abnormal growth are more vulnerable to emotional problems and less capable to control and regulate their emotional reactions [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%