2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of gated verbs by children with Grammatical-Specific Language Impairment: Effects of inflection and frequency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, children with SLI vacillated more between the target and incorrect cohort items after the isolation point, suggesting that word recognition in SLI is more vulnerable to interference from competing activated representations. This finding was replicated by Marshall and van der Lely (2008).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, children with SLI vacillated more between the target and incorrect cohort items after the isolation point, suggesting that word recognition in SLI is more vulnerable to interference from competing activated representations. This finding was replicated by Marshall and van der Lely (2008).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Parallel studies of SLI real-time processing abilities could be quite illuminating; not only could direct comparisons be made between typical and atypical language processing development, but also the results could be evaluated within the sometimes highly articulated processing theories that exist in this literature. To date, however, relatively few behavioral studies have used real-time measures to investigate children with SLI (e.g., Ellis Weismer, Evans, & Hesketh, 1999; Marinis & van der Lely, 2007; Marshall & van der Lely, 2006, 2008; Montgomery, 2000, 2002; Montgomery & Leonard, 1998; Montgomery, Scudder, & Moore, 1990; Sabisch, Hahne, Glass, von Suchodoletz, & Friederici, 2006; Stark & Montgomery, 1995; van der Lely, 2005) and only one has used the visual-world paradigm (i.e., a study of adolescents with SLI; McMurray, Samelson, Lee, & Tomblin, 2010, discussed further below).…”
Section: Real-time Processing Approach To Understanding Slimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In gated lexical identification tasks, children with SLI require more time than do their TD peers to identify known words in isolation (Mainela-Arnold, et al, 2008; Marshall & van der Lely, 2008). Finally, children with SLI are also slower than their typical peers to identify and retrieve the meanings of words embedded in ongoing sentences (Montgomery, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%