2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2015.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of high frequency words from speech as a predictor of L2 listening comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
97
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, Weir (2005:78) suggests that item writers should always investigate whether "the input or out text require knowledge of too many unknown lexical items." While recent research (e.g., Matthews and Cheng 2015) suggests that high-frequency words only partially account for the variance in the listening comprehension scores, the negative impact of low-frequency/unknown vocabulary seems to remain undisputed. Kobeleva's (2012) study, for instance, shows that even the presence of unknown proper names in a listening comprehension text can negatively affect the performance of test-takers.…”
Section: Contextually Valid Texts: Lexical and Syntactic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, Weir (2005:78) suggests that item writers should always investigate whether "the input or out text require knowledge of too many unknown lexical items." While recent research (e.g., Matthews and Cheng 2015) suggests that high-frequency words only partially account for the variance in the listening comprehension scores, the negative impact of low-frequency/unknown vocabulary seems to remain undisputed. Kobeleva's (2012) study, for instance, shows that even the presence of unknown proper names in a listening comprehension text can negatively affect the performance of test-takers.…”
Section: Contextually Valid Texts: Lexical and Syntactic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The C&G and the FCE, on the other hand, are similar in this respect. Since frequency and familiarity of the lexis are significant factors affecting the difficulty of the test (see Buck 2001;Kobeleva 2012;and Matthews and Cheng 2015), the results can be interpreted as showing that the GM is lexically the most demanding of the three tests analysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a speech example of N = 8 word, assume that {s(0), s(1), ⋯, s(4), s (5), s (6), s (7), s(8)} = {0, 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210}. The speech recognition task fails if the total score reaches S = 100.…”
Section: An Numerical Example Analysis Of the First Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below, we analyse the conditions under the same threshold and different () si score arrays. The above score array { () si } = {s(0), s(1), ⋯, s(4), s (5), s (6), s (7), s(8)} = {0, 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210} is increasing, but it is increasing irregularly. Now, we analyse other three regular increments, that is, () si is a function value.…”
Section: An Numerical Example Analysis Of the Second Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation