1989
DOI: 10.1017/s0142716400009048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of isolated words: The dynamics of cohort reduction

Abstract: In the experiment reported here, subjects heard the beginnings of spoken words, followed by increasingly larger segments of word-onset information until the words could be correctly identified. The likelihood of word identification at any given point was found to be an inverse power function of the number of words in a dictionary count that began with the same sounds as the stimulus. Subjects' prerecognition responses consisted of words drawn from a wide range of word frequencies. The variance in frequency dec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This measure was taken from the midpoint of the KP word to take into account the finding that word recognition often occurs before the full duration of a word has been heard, especially when heard within a sentence context (Grosjean, 1980; Wayland et al, 1989; Lash et al, 2013). Data for incorrect initial target selections were excluded from the analyses ( M = 6.8% of trials for older adults; M = 4.8% of trials for younger adults).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure was taken from the midpoint of the KP word to take into account the finding that word recognition often occurs before the full duration of a word has been heard, especially when heard within a sentence context (Grosjean, 1980; Wayland et al, 1989; Lash et al, 2013). Data for incorrect initial target selections were excluded from the analyses ( M = 6.8% of trials for older adults; M = 4.8% of trials for younger adults).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose we employed the technique of word onset gating , in which participants hear increasing amounts of word onset information (the onset gate size) until a word can be correctly identified (Grosjean, 1980, 1996). Although hearing the initial sound of a word, such as the “ca” (/kæ/) in “camera” may activate all words known to the listener that share this initial sound (e.g., camel , cactus , castle ), this number progressively decreases as more of the word onset is heard, and the words that no longer share this onset become eliminated (Marslen-Wilson & Zwitserlood, 1989; Wayland, Wingfield & Goodglass, 1989). Because the number of possible word candidates that share the same initial sounds declines steeply as a word unfolds in time (Tyler, 1984; Wayland et al, 1989), correct word identification often occurs even before the full word duration of a stimulus word has been heard (Grosjean, 1980; Marslen-Wilson, 1984; Lindfield, Wingfield & Goodglass, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is little empirical evidence to contradict these findings. Even so, some retain misgivings about the gating task, which center on the possibility that it is subject to the influence of postperceptual processes and thus inappropriate for studying core aspects of recognition (e.g., Wayland, Wingfield, & Goodglass, 1989;cf. Craig et aI., 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%