1992
DOI: 10.1021/ja00040a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of mitomycin C-DNA monoadducts by UVRABC nuclease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
49
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test this possibility the 61-bp DNA fragments containing a site-specific MC-mono-dG adduct were 5′-end- 32 P labeled at either the MC-adduct strands (substrate 1) or the non-adducted strands as shown in Figure 1B, and then reacted with UvrABC nuclease for different time periods. The results in Figure 2A show that UvrABC incises the MC-mono-dG-containing strands as a function of incubation time and incisions mainly occur at 7 nt with minor incisions 8 and 9 nt, 5′ to the MC-dG; these results are consistent with previous findings (10,21). In contrast, UvrABC does not incise the complementary strands that do not contain an MC-mono-dG adduct even after a 60-min incubation period (Figure 2B ) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To test this possibility the 61-bp DNA fragments containing a site-specific MC-mono-dG adduct were 5′-end- 32 P labeled at either the MC-adduct strands (substrate 1) or the non-adducted strands as shown in Figure 1B, and then reacted with UvrABC nuclease for different time periods. The results in Figure 2A show that UvrABC incises the MC-mono-dG-containing strands as a function of incubation time and incisions mainly occur at 7 nt with minor incisions 8 and 9 nt, 5′ to the MC-dG; these results are consistent with previous findings (10,21). In contrast, UvrABC does not incise the complementary strands that do not contain an MC-mono-dG adduct even after a 60-min incubation period (Figure 2B ) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The densitometric data indicated that both the 5′ and 3′ nearest neighbor bases surrounding the guanine site affect it’s susceptibility to drug modification and that MM lesions occurred predominantly at 5′CG sequences. [100] Phillips, White, and Cullinane implemented an in vitro transcription assay exhibiting blockage of transcription by E. coli RNA polymerase at specific DNA sites when mitomycin C was reduced by xanthine oxidase/NADH, that showed selectivity for XpC sequences of the non-coding strand, corresponding to G selectivity of the coding strand. [101] Through experiments in the Hopkins lab involving sequence-random cleavage of MMC cross-linked DNA, the sequence specificity of the cross links was determined at single nucleotide resolution to be at the G of 5′- d(CG) in strong preference to 5′-d(GC).…”
Section: Biochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monoalkylation appears preferentially at 5'-CG (19)(20)(21) and to a lesser extent 5'-GG sequences (19)(20)(21). It has also been demonstrated that the 3'-base has a relatively modulating effect on the guanine reactivity (20,21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Monoalkylation appears preferentially at 5'-CG (19)(20)(21) and to a lesser extent 5'-GG sequences (19)(20)(21). It has also been demonstrated that the 3'-base has a relatively modulating effect on the guanine reactivity (20,21 ). Some authors (19,21) proposed the high specificity of 5'-CG sequence as the result of the stabilization of the monofunctional adduct through an H-bond between the C 10 -0 atom of activated mitomycin C and the 2NH 2 group of the guanine residue of the complementary strand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%