1988
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(88)90078-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of Mycoplasma arthritidis membrane antigens by rats and rabbits: Comparison by immunoblotting and radioimmunoprecipitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antisera. Rabbit antisera were prepared against each strain as described previously (51)(52)(53)(54); the resulting antibody responses were directed largely against surface antigens. Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) G9a and 7a (isotype immunoglobulin G2A [IgG2A]), directed against putative adhesins MAA1 and MAA2 from strain 158p10p9, respectively, were also described previously (52).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antisera. Rabbit antisera were prepared against each strain as described previously (51)(52)(53)(54); the resulting antibody responses were directed largely against surface antigens. Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) G9a and 7a (isotype immunoglobulin G2A [IgG2A]), directed against putative adhesins MAA1 and MAA2 from strain 158p10p9, respectively, were also described previously (52).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strain-specific antisera. Female New Zealand White rabbits obtained from a local supplier were immunized with each ofthe four M. arthritidis strains as described previously (38,39). These rabbits were part of an earlier experiment on the immune response of arthritic rats and rabbits to M.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…arthritidis membrane antigens (38); therefore, the immunization protocol was actually designed to induce an active infection. Briefly, each rabbit was injected intraarticularly with 1 x 109 CFU in each knee, followed by a second injection of 3 x 109 CFU by the intravenous route 5 weeks later.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) pAb anti-ISR1 (Kirchhoff et al, 1983a) and (ii) pAb anti-1 5 8~1 0 were prepared against whole broth-grown cells of M. arthitidis strain ISRl and substrain 158~10, respectively, according to the protocol of Morton & Roberts (1967), as recently described (Rosengarten e t al., 1994). The preparation and characteristics of (iii) pAb anti-PG6 to M. arthritidis strain PG6 and (iv) pAb anti-H606 to strain H606 have been previously described in detail (Washburn et al, 1985(Washburn et al, ,1988Washburn & Hirsch, 1990 Colony immunoblotting. Colony immunoblots for detection of surface antigenic variants were prepared as previously described (Rosengarten & Wise, 1990Rosengarten et al, 1994).…”
Section: Labelling Of Mycoplasmas M Arthritidis Strains Substrainsmentioning
confidence: 99%