2015
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2015.2402652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of Nutrition Intake Using Time-Frequency Decomposition in a Wearable Necklace Using a Piezoelectric Sensor

Abstract: Food intake levels, hydration, ingestion rate, and dietary choices are all factors known to impact the risk of obesity. This paper presents a novel wearable system in the form of a necklace, which aggregates data from an embedded piezoelectric sensor capable of detecting skin motion in the lower trachea during ingestion. The skin motion produces an output voltage with varying frequencies over time. As a result we propose an algorithm based on time-frequency decomposition, spectrogram analysis of piezoelectric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we have achieved a classification accuracy of 80.3% in real-life settings over 17 food categories. Our system outperforms the state-of-the-art piezoelectric sensor based method [13]. Third, we have developed a smartphone application that sends real-time feedback to the user about the number of swallows detected by the necklace for each food category, and suggests time for the next meal and exercise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we have achieved a classification accuracy of 80.3% in real-life settings over 17 food categories. Our system outperforms the state-of-the-art piezoelectric sensor based method [13]. Third, we have developed a smartphone application that sends real-time feedback to the user about the number of swallows detected by the necklace for each food category, and suggests time for the next meal and exercise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classifier achieved an average F-score of 96.28% for leave-one-out cross-validation (participant level). Several sensor systems have been presented where the accuracy of food intake detection varies from 80% to 96% [18], [19], [24], [25], [34]. For most of these sensor systems, their ability to detect food intake was tested when the participants were sedentary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another common limitation of the current techniques for food intake monitoring is the use of the epoch-based classification to detect chewing ([16], [18], [19], [23]–[25]) and to compute the number of chews. With this approach, the sensor signal is split into short segments (epochs) which then are classified either as chewing or no chewing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of such technology is beneficial for supporting healthy behavior and may have long‐term health benefits (for a review, please see Fritz, Huang, Murphy, and Zimmerman []). In addition to measuring physical activity, wearable sensors (e.g., wrist or necklace sensor) and nonwearable sensors (e.g., fork and tray) have been designed to accurately and objectively measure quantity and rate of food intake in an everyday environment (e.g., Alshurafa et al, ; Dong, Scisco, Wilson, Muth, & Hoover, ). However, these devices have not yet been tested with individuals with EDs.…”
Section: Sensor Technology In Physical Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the ability for both wearable and nonwearable sensors to detect patterns and deviations in motion has allowed caregivers to predict and prevent dangerous situations (e.g., falling) in elderly patients with Parkinson's disease and Dementia (e.g., Yu, 2008 Fritz, Huang, Murphy, and Zimmerman [2014]). In addition to measuring physical activity, wearable sensors (e.g., wrist or necklace sensor) and nonwearable sensors (e.g., fork and tray) have been designed to accurately and objectively measure quantity and rate of food intake in an everyday environment (e.g., Alshurafa et al, 2015;Dong, Scisco, Wilson, Muth, & Hoover, 2014). However, these devices have not yet been tested with individuals with EDs.…”
Section: Sensor Technology In Physical Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%