Tectonic and Eustatic Controls on Sedimentary Cycles 1994
DOI: 10.2110/csp.94.04.0171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of Regional (Eustatic?) and Local (Tectonic?) Relative Sea-Level Events in Outcrop and Gamma-Ray Logs, Ordovician, West Virginia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amplitudes of the sea-level oscillations indicate that the late Campanian-Maastrichtian sequence boundaries in the Anambra Basin are more deeply incised than the corresponding sequence boundaries on the Haq et al (1988) sea-level chart. This suggests that local basin subsidence played a major role in determining the depth of the incisions (Diecchio and Brodersen, 1994;Ardies et al, 2002). The progressive southwestward migration of the depocentre and basin axis, and the pattern of regional facies changes within the cycles discussed in this paper, are consistent with differential basin subsidence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The amplitudes of the sea-level oscillations indicate that the late Campanian-Maastrichtian sequence boundaries in the Anambra Basin are more deeply incised than the corresponding sequence boundaries on the Haq et al (1988) sea-level chart. This suggests that local basin subsidence played a major role in determining the depth of the incisions (Diecchio and Brodersen, 1994;Ardies et al, 2002). The progressive southwestward migration of the depocentre and basin axis, and the pattern of regional facies changes within the cycles discussed in this paper, are consistent with differential basin subsidence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…earliest Silurian. Finally, correlation of global sea level inferred from cumulative aggradation plots and gamma ray logs of the Juniata Formation has revealed that the upper Juniata Formation is Hirnantian (Diecchio and Broderson 1994;Diecchio 1995) and thus correlative with global marine regression and glaciation in Saharan Africa (Le Heron and Craig 2008;Ghienne et al 2014).…”
Section: Geological Setting Of Appalachian Ordovician Paleosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only selected unconformities are shown on cross section E-E′. Regional unconformities shown on section E-E′ and in figure 2 include the Middle Ordovician (Knox) unconformity (Harris and Repetski, 1982;Mussman and others, 1988), the Upper Ordovician-Lower Silurian Cherokee unconformity (Dennison and Head, 1975;Diecchio and Brodersen, 1994), the Middle-Upper Devonian unconformity (de Witt and others, 1993), and the Lower Pennsylvanian unconformity (Arkle and others, 1979;Beuthin, 1994). The correlation of these unconformities with North American sequences of Sloss (1988) is shown in figure 2 and by Swezey (2002).…”
Section: Construction Of the Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%