1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61888-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition Processes in Character Naming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
101
5
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
101
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of significant consistency effects for Kanji is different not only from English but from word-naming data in other languages as well, for example, Italian (e.g., Colombo, 1992) and, more strikingly, Chinese (Hue, 1992;Yin, Butterworth, & Patterson, 1995). Most Chinese characters are phonograms with two components: the radical, which represents a broad semantic field (i.e., a clue to the meaning of the character), and the phonetic component, which typically provides a clue to the pronunciation of the character.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of significant consistency effects for Kanji is different not only from English but from word-naming data in other languages as well, for example, Italian (e.g., Colombo, 1992) and, more strikingly, Chinese (Hue, 1992;Yin, Butterworth, & Patterson, 1995). Most Chinese characters are phonograms with two components: the radical, which represents a broad semantic field (i.e., a clue to the meaning of the character), and the phonetic component, which typically provides a clue to the pronunciation of the character.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Even more germane to the present article, both Hue (1992 Norris & Brown, 1985); The great majority of irregular English words deviate from a more typical, rule-governed pronunciation only in one à § two p b nemes, typically the vowel (e.g., the regularized pomnciations of caste andpint are only one phoneme different f i ' t h c correct pronunciations). If much, even though not all, ofwimt the reader computes at the subword level is applica.We to the final pronunciation, then once again it may be more.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The consistency score, defined by type, is a measure of the total number of friends to the total number of neighbors. Similar to the findings in English, several studies have shown consistency effects in naming Chinese characters (Fang et al, 1986;Hue, 1992;Yang, McCandliss, Shu, & Zevin, 2009). However, these studies have been inconsistent as to whether the consistency effect emerged in naming high-frequency characters.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…Character frequency A considerable amount of evidence has indicated that character frequency is a powerful predictor of RTs in Chinese character recognition; frequency effects have been observed consistently in a wide range of tasks (Hue, 1992;Lee et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2007;Yang et al, 2009). Higher frequency characters tend to be processed more quickly than lower frequency characters during naming (Lee et al, 2005;Yang et al, 2009).…”
Section: Lexical Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%