2024
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c10165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing Agricultural Headwaters as Critical Ecosystems

Magdalena Bieroza,
Lukas Hallberg,
John Livsey
et al.

Abstract: Agricultural headwaters are positioned at the interface between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and, therefore, at the margins of scientific disciplines. They are deemed devoid of biodiversity and too polluted by ecologists, overlooked by hydrologists, and are perceived as a nuisance by landowners and water authorities. While agricultural streams are widespread and represent a major habitat in terms of stream length, they remain understudied and thereby undervalued. Agricultural headwater streams are signif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
(140 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When estimating cost-effectiveness other ecosystem services enabled by SM such as flood control, biodiversity improvement, and social benefits should be taken into account (Hambäck et al, 2023). Stream mitigation can achieve a higher cost-effectiveness compared to measures strictly focusing on one ecosystem service or water quality problem (Bieroza et al, 2024;Djodjic et al, 2022). For example, SM is the only tested measure that also significantly impacted discharge dynamics, which is promising for mitigating floods and droughts under climate change (Figure 4).…”
Section: Trade-offs and Synergies In Mitigating Nutrient Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When estimating cost-effectiveness other ecosystem services enabled by SM such as flood control, biodiversity improvement, and social benefits should be taken into account (Hambäck et al, 2023). Stream mitigation can achieve a higher cost-effectiveness compared to measures strictly focusing on one ecosystem service or water quality problem (Bieroza et al, 2024;Djodjic et al, 2022). For example, SM is the only tested measure that also significantly impacted discharge dynamics, which is promising for mitigating floods and droughts under climate change (Figure 4).…”
Section: Trade-offs and Synergies In Mitigating Nutrient Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%