2002
DOI: 10.1177/1534582302001001003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing Emotion from Facial Expressions: Psychological and Neurological Mechanisms

Abstract: Recognizing emotion from facial expressions draws on diverse psychological processes implemented in a large, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The sheer diversity of findings precludes any simple summary and argues against the isolation of only a few structures. Instead, it is becoming clear that recognizing facial emotion draws on multiple strategies subserved by a large array of different brain structures. This review will focus on those processes and structures whose role we understand best … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

61
870
6
50

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,201 publications
(987 citation statements)
references
References 318 publications
(387 reference statements)
61
870
6
50
Order By: Relevance
“…The weaker effect for the zygomaticus is consistent with studies that found less pronounced differentiations between positive and negative affect for the zygomaticus than the corrugator muscle (Larsen et al, 2003), while other publications report stronger effects for the zygomaticus (Moody & McIntosh, 2011). Since upper and lower face muscles are partly innervated by different brain regions (Adolphs, 2002), it would Unconscious Emotional Facial Activation 15 be worth investigating if these results indicate that reactivity of these muscles are mediated by different processes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The weaker effect for the zygomaticus is consistent with studies that found less pronounced differentiations between positive and negative affect for the zygomaticus than the corrugator muscle (Larsen et al, 2003), while other publications report stronger effects for the zygomaticus (Moody & McIntosh, 2011). Since upper and lower face muscles are partly innervated by different brain regions (Adolphs, 2002), it would Unconscious Emotional Facial Activation 15 be worth investigating if these results indicate that reactivity of these muscles are mediated by different processes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The remainder frequently chose discrimination/matching tasks that require judging whether or not 2 faces express the same emotion (Table 2). This may reflect different stages in the FER processs 55. Although both involve intact perceptual information processes occurring relatively early after stimulus onset, identification requires additional knowledge yielded by a categorization process.…”
Section: Discrepancies In Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this theory, emotion recognition is facilitated by internally generated somatosensory representations triggered by the simulation of a perceived facial expression that partially activates the corresponding emotional state in the observer 55, 125, 126, 127. This is subtended by somatosensory‐related cortices and could be linked to facial mimicry, the tendency to replicate others' facial expressions 128, 129.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facial emotions have a well-established categorical system (Ekman and Friesen, 1967; for a review see Adolphs, 2002); therefore, there is an increasing interest concerning whether changes of facial emotions are detected automatically. In other words, these studies investigated the possibility of vMMN to the appearance of infrequent (deviant) emotions within the sequence of frequent (standard) emotions.…”
Section: Emotional Expression and Vmmnmentioning
confidence: 99%