Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2661829.2661997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing Humor on Twitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Mihalcea and Strapparava (2005) defined three types of humorspecific stylistic features: Alliteration, Antonym and Adult Slang, and trained a classifier based on these feature representations. Similarly, Zhang and Liu (2014) designed several categories of humor-related features, derived from influential humor theories, linguistic norms, and affective dimensions, and input around fifty features into the Gradient Boosting Regression Tree model for humor recognition. Taylor and Mazlack (2004) recognized wordplay jokes based on statistical language recognition techniques, where they learned statistical patterns of text in N-grams and provided a heuristic focus for a location of where wordplay may or may not occur.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Mihalcea and Strapparava (2005) defined three types of humorspecific stylistic features: Alliteration, Antonym and Adult Slang, and trained a classifier based on these feature representations. Similarly, Zhang and Liu (2014) designed several categories of humor-related features, derived from influential humor theories, linguistic norms, and affective dimensions, and input around fifty features into the Gradient Boosting Regression Tree model for humor recognition. Taylor and Mazlack (2004) recognized wordplay jokes based on statistical language recognition techniques, where they learned statistical patterns of text in N-grams and provided a heuristic focus for a location of where wordplay may or may not occur.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, humor is essentially associated with sentiment (Zhang and Liu, 2014) and subjectivity (Wiebe and Mihalcea, 2006). For example, a sentence is likely to be humorous if it contains some words carrying strong sentiment, such as 'idiot' as follows.…”
Section: Interpersonal Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They noted that negative sentiment, humancenteredness and lexical centrality were their most important model features. Zhang and Liu (2014) trained a classifier using tweets that use the hashtag #Humor for positive examples. They concluded that tweet part-of-speech ratios are a major factor in humor detection.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with previous work (Radev et al, 2015;Zhang and Liu, 2014), we used the following features as input to the model:…”
Section: Xgboost Feature-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be extremely challenging (Attardo, 1994) because no universal definition of humor has been achieved, humor is highly contextual, and there are many different types of humor with different characteristics (Raz, 2012). Previous studies (Mihalcea and 1 http://alt.qcri.org/semeval2017/task6/ Strapparava, 2005;Yang et al, 2015;Zhang and Liu, 2014;Purandare and Litman, 2006;Bertero and Fung, 2016) dealt with the humor recognition task as a binary classification task, which was to categorize a given text as humorous or non-humorous (Li et al, 2016). Textual data consisting of comparable amounts of humorous texts and nonhumorous texts were collected, and a classification model was then built using textual features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%