2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016gc006386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing magnetostratigraphy in overprinted and altered marine sediments: Challenges and solutions from IODP Site U1437

Abstract: Core disturbance, drilling overprints, postdepositional acquisition of remanence, authigenic growth of magnetic iron sulfides, and alteration all contribute challenges to recognizing the primary magnetostratigraphy in marine sediments. We address these issues in a sequence of tuffaceous muds and volcaniclastics at International Ocean Discovery Program Site U1437 and produce the longest continuous magnetic polarity stratigraphy in the history of scientific ocean drilling. Remanence measurements were filtered to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The robust age models and multiple volcanic events at both sites, provide the opportunity for a high‐resolution, time‐precise record of volcanic activity in the Izu arc. Overall, the excellent biostratigraphic and magnetostratigraphic data (Musgrave & Kars, ; Tamura et al, ; Vautravers et al, ) in Units I–III at Site U1437 demonstrate that the tephra layers represent a time series of instantaneous volcanic events that were preserved within rapidly accumulating tuffaceous mud, and that shows no evidence for hiatuses (Tamura et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robust age models and multiple volcanic events at both sites, provide the opportunity for a high‐resolution, time‐precise record of volcanic activity in the Izu arc. Overall, the excellent biostratigraphic and magnetostratigraphic data (Musgrave & Kars, ; Tamura et al, ; Vautravers et al, ) in Units I–III at Site U1437 demonstrate that the tephra layers represent a time series of instantaneous volcanic events that were preserved within rapidly accumulating tuffaceous mud, and that shows no evidence for hiatuses (Tamura et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron oxides would have been preserved as inclusions within sheet silicates and would not have been affected by diagenesis (Chang, Bolton, et al, 2016;Shi et al, 2017). That may explain why Musgrave and Kars (2016) were able to establish a reliable magnetostratigraphy in the studied interval. Elemental composition variations are more likely associated with redox conditions rather than with detrital provenance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We term this behavior “punctuated diagenesis.” In some cases (fluid anomalies 1, 3, 6, and 8) this results in decreased coercivity, presumably by selective destruction of SD or vortex state grains of either magnetite (by dissolution) or greigite (by conversion to pyrite), while in others (fluid anomalies 2, 4, 5, and 9) it enhances coercivity, which in most of the sequence appears to be due to repeated phases of greigite authigenesis, based on the SIRM/κ response and the lack of evidence for significant proportions of SD magnetite or pyrrhotite. Possible mechanisms for greigite authigenesis may involve neoformation on pyrite grains (Jiang et al, ) as seen in SEM images from Hole U1437B (Musgrave & Kars, ), on authigenic smectite and chlorite (Roberts & Weaver, ) and possibly on siderite (Sagnotti et al, ). The relationships of these diagenetic processes to the fluid anomalies at Site U1437 are complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghost polarity intervals found at intervals within the sequence resulted from episodes of early diagenetic greigite growth within the initial sulfate reduction zone, but the success in identifying the magnetic polarity record down to 1,320 mbsf suggests that neither the repeated episodes of greigite authigenesis, nor the progressive conversion of greigite to pyrite and continued dissolution of magnetite, completely degraded the remanence record within the mud‐rich sequence of Units I through V. Continuity of the polarity signal was only lost when the shift to the coarser, volcaniclastic‐dominated lithology of Units VI and VII compounded the effects of progressive magnetic mineral diagenesis. Even within Units VI and VII some samples still record a stable remanence, evidenced by the recognition of reversed polarity in a few isolated samples (Musgrave & Kars, ). Stable remanence in these reduced, coarse‐grained units may be carried by magnetite inclusions within silicates, as evidenced by the presence of a SD component in the sample from coarse‐grained Unit VII (Figure D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation