2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2947091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing Multidimensional Engagement of E-Learners Based on Multi-Channel Data in E-Learning Environment

Abstract: Lack of supervision'' is a particularly challenging problem in E-learning or distance learning environments. A wide range of research efforts and technologies have been explored to alleviate its impact by monitoring students' engagement, such as emotion or learning behaviors. However, the current research still lacks multi-dimensional computational measures for analyzing learner's engagement from the interactions that occur in digital learning environment. In this paper, we propose an integrated framework to i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, N. L. Henderson, Rowe, Mott, and Lester (2019), reduced the dimensionality of the features using principal component analysis (PCA) in two different configurations: (a) they concatenated all of the features of the sources and applied PCA to the resulting vector; (b) they applied PCA to the features of each source first and concatenated the results following the reduction of dimensionality. Yue et al (2019) selected the best features first and then reduced dimensionality using two approaches, PCA and a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The other studies in the early category based fusion on mere concatenation of the features extracted from each source into a single vector of features which fed into the subsequent analysis.…”
Section: Data Fusion Techniques In Multimodal La/edmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, N. L. Henderson, Rowe, Mott, and Lester (2019), reduced the dimensionality of the features using principal component analysis (PCA) in two different configurations: (a) they concatenated all of the features of the sources and applied PCA to the resulting vector; (b) they applied PCA to the features of each source first and concatenated the results following the reduction of dimensionality. Yue et al (2019) selected the best features first and then reduced dimensionality using two approaches, PCA and a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The other studies in the early category based fusion on mere concatenation of the features extracted from each source into a single vector of features which fed into the subsequent analysis.…”
Section: Data Fusion Techniques In Multimodal La/edmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Liu et al (2019) had a wide range of different types of data with numerous means for capturing it, whereas Nam Liao et al (2019) went in the opposite direction, as it only included numerical digital data. Yue et al (2019) used a wide range of fused data (facial expressions, eye tracking, grades, etc.) and was the only study to include an open data source in the fusion.…”
Section: Online Classroom Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Smart e-learning refers to a new paradigm of online education informatization, based on educational data, to integrate modern education theory with supporting technologies to achieve In smart e-learning, descriptive analytics aims to describe, summarize, and analyse historical and educational data and carry out typical tasks that include e-learner profiling [2] and KG construction [5]. Diagnostic analytics is to identify causes of learning trends and outcomes of e-learners, while continuous analytics is to monitor the status of e-learners and resource utilization, decide, and act autonomously or semi-autonomously.…”
Section: Current Supporting Technologies and Services Of Smart E-learmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E-learning has become a generalized strategy that has helped in a short time to make the transition to a new training model that has resulted in greater interaction with concepts, more student dedication, a higher level of commitment, and better assimilation (Mystakidis, Berki, and Valtanen, 2019). However, it is also true that it has produced deficiencies at an emotional level in terms of social interaction between individuals and has neglected the practical aspects of laboratory and on-site training that are fundamental to technical and technological training courses (Baki, Birgoren, and Aktepe, 2018;You and Robert, 2018;Yue et al, 2019). From these weaknesses of the new model arises the need for rapid update and improvement that allows the level of interaction of laboratories while strengthening the positive elements of Elearning and observing the rules of social isolation (Flor, Belmonte, and Fabregat, 2018; Lin, Wang, Wu, and Chen, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%